File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Efficacy and safety of selinexor for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: A meta-analysis

TitleEfficacy and safety of selinexor for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: A meta-analysis
Authors
KeywordsMeta-analysis
Multiple myeloma [MesH]
Selinexor [Mesh]
SINE compounds
Issue Date26-Mar-2024
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Current Problems in Cancer, 2024, v. 50 How to Cite?
AbstractPurpose: Selinexor is a first-in-class, oral selective-inhibitor-of-nuclear-export, granted accelerated approval by FDA (2019) for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We sought to quantitatively summarize the selinexor efficacy and safety in RRMM. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, clinicaltrial.gov, and google scholar, until May 2023, studies about selinexor use in RRMM. The outcome measures of interest were primarily efficacy outcomes, in addition to safety outcomes. Random-effect model analyses were performed, at statistical significance of P<0.05, using the RevMan software. Results: Meta-analyses of eleven included clinical trials yielded a significant 56.21% overall clinical benefit, 46.91% overall response, 4.89% complete response, 23.41% very good partial response, 24.68% partial response, and 28.06% stable disease rates with selinexor. Due to safety reasons, selinexor caused significant increase in discontinuation rate, 16.80%. Subgroup analyses demonstrated higher efficacy with selinexor plus dexamethasone and proteasome inhibitor combinations than with selinexor alone. The multiple myeloma type, high cytogenetic risk, refractory state, and advanced disease state did not affect performance. Risk of selection, performance, and detection biases were unclear in the included trials. Conclusion: Selinexor led to significant positive responses with an acceptable safety profile in RRMM patients, despite higher rates of safety-related discontinuations. Selinexor-based combinations further enhanced response.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/348737
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.759

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShafei, Laila-
dc.contributor.authorBashir, Shaima-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Esther W-
dc.contributor.authorAbushanab, Dina-
dc.contributor.authorHamad, Anas-
dc.contributor.authorAl-Badriyeh, Daoud-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-15T00:30:31Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-15T00:30:31Z-
dc.date.issued2024-03-26-
dc.identifier.citationCurrent Problems in Cancer, 2024, v. 50-
dc.identifier.issn0147-0272-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/348737-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Selinexor is a first-in-class, oral selective-inhibitor-of-nuclear-export, granted accelerated approval by FDA (2019) for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We sought to quantitatively summarize the selinexor efficacy and safety in RRMM. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, clinicaltrial.gov, and google scholar, until May 2023, studies about selinexor use in RRMM. The outcome measures of interest were primarily efficacy outcomes, in addition to safety outcomes. Random-effect model analyses were performed, at statistical significance of P<0.05, using the RevMan software. Results: Meta-analyses of eleven included clinical trials yielded a significant 56.21% overall clinical benefit, 46.91% overall response, 4.89% complete response, 23.41% very good partial response, 24.68% partial response, and 28.06% stable disease rates with selinexor. Due to safety reasons, selinexor caused significant increase in discontinuation rate, 16.80%. Subgroup analyses demonstrated higher efficacy with selinexor plus dexamethasone and proteasome inhibitor combinations than with selinexor alone. The multiple myeloma type, high cytogenetic risk, refractory state, and advanced disease state did not affect performance. Risk of selection, performance, and detection biases were unclear in the included trials. Conclusion: Selinexor led to significant positive responses with an acceptable safety profile in RRMM patients, despite higher rates of safety-related discontinuations. Selinexor-based combinations further enhanced response.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofCurrent Problems in Cancer-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectMeta-analysis-
dc.subjectMultiple myeloma [MesH]-
dc.subjectSelinexor [Mesh]-
dc.subjectSINE compounds-
dc.titleEfficacy and safety of selinexor for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: A meta-analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2024.101076-
dc.identifier.pmid38537395-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85188816803-
dc.identifier.volume50-
dc.identifier.eissn1535-6345-
dc.identifier.issnl0147-0272-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats