File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: How Should Liberal Democratic Governments Treat Conscientious Disobedience as a Response to State Injustice?: A Proposal

TitleHow Should Liberal Democratic Governments Treat Conscientious Disobedience as a Response to State Injustice?: A Proposal
Authors
Issue Date11-Apr-2022
PublisherCambridge University Press
Citation
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 2022, v. 91 How to Cite?
Abstract

This paper suggests that liberal democratic governments adopt a reconciliatory approach to conscientious disobedience. Central to this approach is the view – independent of whether conscientious disobedience is always morally justified – that conscientious disobedience is normatively distinct from other criminal acts with similar effects, and such distinction is worthy of acknowledgment by public apparatus and actors. The prerogative applies to both civil and uncivil instances of disobedience, as defined and explored in the paper. Governments and courts ought to take the normative distinction seriously and treat the conscientious disobedients in a more lenient way than they treat ordinary criminals. A comprehensive legislative scheme for governments to deal with prosecution, sentencing, and imprisonment of the conscientious disobedients will be proposed, with the normative and practical benefits of such an approach discussed in detail.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/348816
ISSN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWong, Brian Yue Shun-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Joseph-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-16T00:30:20Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-16T00:30:20Z-
dc.date.issued2022-04-11-
dc.identifier.citationRoyal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 2022, v. 91-
dc.identifier.issn1358-2461-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/348816-
dc.description.abstract<p>This paper suggests that liberal democratic governments adopt a reconciliatory approach to conscientious disobedience. Central to this approach is the view – independent of whether conscientious disobedience is always morally justified – that conscientious disobedience is normatively distinct from other criminal acts with similar effects, and such distinction is worthy of acknowledgment by public apparatus and actors. The prerogative applies to both civil and uncivil instances of disobedience, as defined and explored in the paper. Governments and courts ought to take the normative distinction seriously and treat the conscientious disobedients in a more lenient way than they treat ordinary criminals. A comprehensive legislative scheme for governments to deal with prosecution, sentencing, and imprisonment of the conscientious disobedients will be proposed, with the normative and practical benefits of such an approach discussed in detail.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherCambridge University Press-
dc.relation.ispartofRoyal Institute of Philosophy Supplements-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleHow Should Liberal Democratic Governments Treat Conscientious Disobedience as a Response to State Injustice?: A Proposal-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S1358246122000042-
dc.identifier.volume91-
dc.identifier.eissn1755-3555-
dc.identifier.issnl1358-2461-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats