File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: It’s Not Just “8 Dead”: Examining News and Twitter’s Social Construction of the Atlanta Spa Shootings Through the Lens of Networked Gatekeeping and Affective Publics

TitleIt’s Not Just “8 Dead”: Examining News and Twitter’s Social Construction of the Atlanta Spa Shootings Through the Lens of Networked Gatekeeping and Affective Publics
Authors
Keywordsaffective publics
anti-Asian racism
Atlanta spa shootings
hybrid media system
networked gatekeeping
sentiment analysis
topic modeling
Issue Date2024
Citation
Social Media and Society, 2024, v. 10, n. 3 How to Cite?
AbstractDrawing from the theories of networked gatekeeping and affective publics, this study compares how news media and social media users shaped the discourse surrounding the 2021 Atlanta spa shootings. We investigate both the substantive (topics) and affective (emotions) dimensions of news articles and tweets, showcasing how institutional media and the public engage in the social construction of mass shootings involving people of underserved communities. To do so, we built two datasets: 964 news articles and 265,951 tweets. The findings from the computer-assisted content analysis reveal that Twitter users focused more on humanizing the victims and contextualizing the Atlanta spa shootings within the broader framework of anti-Asian racism, in contrast to the news outlets. Twitter users expressed significantly greater anger and fear than what is reflected in the news articles. This study also demonstrates that the news stories failed to acknowledge the intersecting identities of the victims. The findings contribute to our understanding of how journalists and individuals shape agendas and convey their affective reactions through news and social media. We suggest actions that can be taken to create a more inclusive and culturally responsive media environment.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/349213

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKoo, Gyo Hyun-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Bin-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-17T06:57:01Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-17T06:57:01Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationSocial Media and Society, 2024, v. 10, n. 3-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/349213-
dc.description.abstractDrawing from the theories of networked gatekeeping and affective publics, this study compares how news media and social media users shaped the discourse surrounding the 2021 Atlanta spa shootings. We investigate both the substantive (topics) and affective (emotions) dimensions of news articles and tweets, showcasing how institutional media and the public engage in the social construction of mass shootings involving people of underserved communities. To do so, we built two datasets: 964 news articles and 265,951 tweets. The findings from the computer-assisted content analysis reveal that Twitter users focused more on humanizing the victims and contextualizing the Atlanta spa shootings within the broader framework of anti-Asian racism, in contrast to the news outlets. Twitter users expressed significantly greater anger and fear than what is reflected in the news articles. This study also demonstrates that the news stories failed to acknowledge the intersecting identities of the victims. The findings contribute to our understanding of how journalists and individuals shape agendas and convey their affective reactions through news and social media. We suggest actions that can be taken to create a more inclusive and culturally responsive media environment.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofSocial Media and Society-
dc.subjectaffective publics-
dc.subjectanti-Asian racism-
dc.subjectAtlanta spa shootings-
dc.subjecthybrid media system-
dc.subjectnetworked gatekeeping-
dc.subjectsentiment analysis-
dc.subjecttopic modeling-
dc.titleIt’s Not Just “8 Dead”: Examining News and Twitter’s Social Construction of the Atlanta Spa Shootings Through the Lens of Networked Gatekeeping and Affective Publics-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/20563051241269278-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85201285359-
dc.identifier.volume10-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.eissn2056-3051-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats