File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Journalistic Roles and News Framing: A Comparative Framing Analysis of COVID-19 Pandemic Across China, South Korea, and the United States

TitleJournalistic Roles and News Framing: A Comparative Framing Analysis of COVID-19 Pandemic Across China, South Korea, and the United States
Authors
Keywordscomparative framing analysis
COVID-19 pandemic
frame prevalence
frame valence
journalistic roles
news framing
Issue Date2022
Citation
International Journal of Communication, 2022, v. 16, p. 4254-4274 How to Cite?
AbstractDrawing on the latest Worlds of Journalism report, this study identifies the perceived roles of Chinese, Korean, and American journalists and examines the relationship between these role perceptions and the news frames used during COVID-19. Among the various frames, we looked at which frame was used more in each country (frame prevalence) and how those frames were used (framing valence). Based on a content analysis of the news articles (N = 749), we found that Chinese journalists were more likely to use a frame that reassures people but less likely to emphasize uncertainty or conflict. Although South Korean and American journalists share similar role perceptions, Korean journalists used significantly fewer conflict and uncertainty frames than American journalists. When using consequence and action frames, Chinese media was more likely than Korean and American media to present stories positively. The implications of the findings are discussed.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/349992

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChen, Bin-
dc.contributor.authorKoo, Gyo Hyun-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-17T07:02:21Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-17T07:02:21Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Communication, 2022, v. 16, p. 4254-4274-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/349992-
dc.description.abstractDrawing on the latest Worlds of Journalism report, this study identifies the perceived roles of Chinese, Korean, and American journalists and examines the relationship between these role perceptions and the news frames used during COVID-19. Among the various frames, we looked at which frame was used more in each country (frame prevalence) and how those frames were used (framing valence). Based on a content analysis of the news articles (N = 749), we found that Chinese journalists were more likely to use a frame that reassures people but less likely to emphasize uncertainty or conflict. Although South Korean and American journalists share similar role perceptions, Korean journalists used significantly fewer conflict and uncertainty frames than American journalists. When using consequence and action frames, Chinese media was more likely than Korean and American media to present stories positively. The implications of the findings are discussed.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Communication-
dc.subjectcomparative framing analysis-
dc.subjectCOVID-19 pandemic-
dc.subjectframe prevalence-
dc.subjectframe valence-
dc.subjectjournalistic roles-
dc.subjectnews framing-
dc.titleJournalistic Roles and News Framing: A Comparative Framing Analysis of COVID-19 Pandemic Across China, South Korea, and the United States-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85177093846-
dc.identifier.volume16-
dc.identifier.spage4254-
dc.identifier.epage4274-
dc.identifier.eissn1932-8036-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats