File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Phase transition for the smallest eigenvalue of covariance matrices

TitlePhase transition for the smallest eigenvalue of covariance matrices
Authors
Keywords15A18
60B20
Heavy-tailed random matrix
Sample covariance matrix
Smallest eigenvalue
Tracy–Widom law
Issue Date2024
Citation
Probability Theory and Related Fields, 2024 How to Cite?
AbstractIn this paper, we study the smallest non-zero eigenvalue of the sample covariance matrices S(Y)=YY∗, where Y=(yij) is an M×N matrix with iid mean 0 variance N-1 entries. We consider the regime M=M(N) and M/N→c∞∈R\{1} as N→∞. It is known that for the extreme eigenvalues of Wigner matrices and the largest eigenvalue of S(Y), a weak 4th moment condition is necessary and sufficient for the Tracy–Widom law (Ding and Yang in Ann Appl Probab 28(3):1679–1738, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1214/17-AAP1341; Lee and Yin in Duke Math J 163(1):117–173, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1215/00127094-2414767). In this paper, we show that the Tracy–Widom law is more robust for the smallest eigenvalue of S(Y), by discovering a phase transition induced by the fatness of the tail of yij’s. More specifically, we assume that yij is symmetrically distributed with tail probability P(|Nyij|≥x)∼x-α when x→∞, for some α∈(2,4). We show the following conclusions: (1) When α>83, the smallest eigenvalue follows the Tracy–Widom law on scale N-23; (2) When 2<α<83, the smallest eigenvalue follows the Gaussian law on scale N-α4; (3) When α=83, the distribution is given by an interpolation between Tracy–Widom and Gaussian; (4) In case α≤103, in addition to the left edge of the MP law, a deterministic shift of order N1-α2 shall be subtracted from the smallest eigenvalue, in both the Tracy–Widom law and the Gaussian law. Overall speaking, our proof strategy is inspired by Aggarwal et al. (J Eur Math Soc 23(11):3707–3800, 2021. https://doi.org/10.4171/jems/1089) which is originally done for the bulk regime of the Lévy Wigner matrices. In addition to various technical complications arising from the bulk-to-edge extension, two ingredients are needed for our derivation: an intermediate left edge local law based on a simple but effective matrix minor argument, and a mesoscopic CLT for the linear spectral statistic with asymptotic expansion for its expectation.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/350087
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.326

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBao, Zhigang-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jaehun-
dc.contributor.authorXu, Xiaocong-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-17T07:02:59Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-17T07:02:59Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationProbability Theory and Related Fields, 2024-
dc.identifier.issn0178-8051-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/350087-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we study the smallest non-zero eigenvalue of the sample covariance matrices S(Y)=YY∗, where Y=(yij) is an M×N matrix with iid mean 0 variance N-1 entries. We consider the regime M=M(N) and M/N→c∞∈R\{1} as N→∞. It is known that for the extreme eigenvalues of Wigner matrices and the largest eigenvalue of S(Y), a weak 4th moment condition is necessary and sufficient for the Tracy–Widom law (Ding and Yang in Ann Appl Probab 28(3):1679–1738, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1214/17-AAP1341; Lee and Yin in Duke Math J 163(1):117–173, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1215/00127094-2414767). In this paper, we show that the Tracy–Widom law is more robust for the smallest eigenvalue of S(Y), by discovering a phase transition induced by the fatness of the tail of yij’s. More specifically, we assume that yij is symmetrically distributed with tail probability P(|Nyij|≥x)∼x-α when x→∞, for some α∈(2,4). We show the following conclusions: (1) When α>83, the smallest eigenvalue follows the Tracy–Widom law on scale N-23; (2) When 2<α<83, the smallest eigenvalue follows the Gaussian law on scale N-α4; (3) When α=83, the distribution is given by an interpolation between Tracy–Widom and Gaussian; (4) In case α≤103, in addition to the left edge of the MP law, a deterministic shift of order N1-α2 shall be subtracted from the smallest eigenvalue, in both the Tracy–Widom law and the Gaussian law. Overall speaking, our proof strategy is inspired by Aggarwal et al. (J Eur Math Soc 23(11):3707–3800, 2021. https://doi.org/10.4171/jems/1089) which is originally done for the bulk regime of the Lévy Wigner matrices. In addition to various technical complications arising from the bulk-to-edge extension, two ingredients are needed for our derivation: an intermediate left edge local law based on a simple but effective matrix minor argument, and a mesoscopic CLT for the linear spectral statistic with asymptotic expansion for its expectation.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofProbability Theory and Related Fields-
dc.subject15A18-
dc.subject60B20-
dc.subjectHeavy-tailed random matrix-
dc.subjectSample covariance matrix-
dc.subjectSmallest eigenvalue-
dc.subjectTracy–Widom law-
dc.titlePhase transition for the smallest eigenvalue of covariance matrices-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00440-024-01298-w-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85198432902-
dc.identifier.eissn1432-2064-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats