File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Perception of personalized medicine, pharmacogenomics, and genetic testing among undergraduates in Hong Kong

TitlePerception of personalized medicine, pharmacogenomics, and genetic testing among undergraduates in Hong Kong
Authors
KeywordsEducation
Ethical
Genetic testing
Legal and Social Implications
Personalized medicine
Pharmacogenomics
Issue Date15-Aug-2021
Citation
Human Genome Meeting 2018, 2021, v. 15, n. 1 How to Cite?
Abstract

Background: The global development and advancement of genomic medicine in the recent decade has accelerated the implementation of personalized medicine (PM) and pharmacogenomics (PGx) into clinical practice, while catalyzing the emergence of genetic testing (GT) with relevant ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI). Results: The perception of university undergraduates with regards to PM and PGx was investigated, and 80% of undergraduates valued PM as a promising healthcare model with 66% indicating awareness of personal genome testing companies. When asked about the curriculum design towards PM and PGx, compared to undergraduates in non-medically related curriculum, those studying in medically related curriculum had an adjusted 7.2 odds of perceiving that their curriculum was well-designed for learning PGx (95% CI 3.6–14.6) and a 3.7 odds of perceiving that PGx was important in their study (95% CI 2.0–6.8). Despite this, only 16% of medically related curriculum undergraduates would consider embarking on future education on PM. When asked about their perceptions on GT, 60% rated their genetic knowledge as “School Biology” level or below while 76% would consider undergoing a genetic test. As for ELSI, 75% of undergraduates perceived that they were aware of ethical issues of GT in general, particularly on “Patient Privacy” (80%) and “Data Confidentiality” (68%). Undergraduates were also asked about their perceived reaction upon receiving an unfavorable result from GT, and over half of the participants perceived that they would feel “helpless or pessimistic” (56%), “inadequate or different” (59%), and “disadvantaged at job seeking” (59%), while older undergraduates had an adjusted 2.0 odds of holding the latter opinion (95% CI 1.1–3.5), compared to younger undergraduates. Conclusion: Hong Kong undergraduates showed a high awareness of PM but insufficient genetic knowledge and low interest in pursuing a career towards PM. They were generally aware of ethical issues of GT and especially concerned about patient privacy and data confidentiality. There was a predominance of pessimistic views towards unfavorable testing results. This study calls for the attention to evaluate education and talent development on genomics, and update existing legal frameworks on genetic testing in Hong Kong.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/350356
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.199

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Nicholas Yan Chai-
dc.contributor.authorFung, Jasmine Lee Fong-
dc.contributor.authorNg, Yvette Nga Chung-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Wilfred Hing Sang-
dc.contributor.authorChung, Claudia Ching Yan-
dc.contributor.authorMak, Christopher Chun Yu-
dc.contributor.authorChung, Brian Hon Yin-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-29T00:31:06Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-29T00:31:06Z-
dc.date.issued2021-08-15-
dc.identifier.citationHuman Genome Meeting 2018, 2021, v. 15, n. 1-
dc.identifier.issn1479-7364-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/350356-
dc.description.abstract<p>Background: The global development and advancement of genomic medicine in the recent decade has accelerated the implementation of personalized medicine (PM) and pharmacogenomics (PGx) into clinical practice, while catalyzing the emergence of genetic testing (GT) with relevant ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI). Results: The perception of university undergraduates with regards to PM and PGx was investigated, and 80% of undergraduates valued PM as a promising healthcare model with 66% indicating awareness of personal genome testing companies. When asked about the curriculum design towards PM and PGx, compared to undergraduates in non-medically related curriculum, those studying in medically related curriculum had an adjusted 7.2 odds of perceiving that their curriculum was well-designed for learning PGx (95% CI 3.6–14.6) and a 3.7 odds of perceiving that PGx was important in their study (95% CI 2.0–6.8). Despite this, only 16% of medically related curriculum undergraduates would consider embarking on future education on PM. When asked about their perceptions on GT, 60% rated their genetic knowledge as “School Biology” level or below while 76% would consider undergoing a genetic test. As for ELSI, 75% of undergraduates perceived that they were aware of ethical issues of GT in general, particularly on “Patient Privacy” (80%) and “Data Confidentiality” (68%). Undergraduates were also asked about their perceived reaction upon receiving an unfavorable result from GT, and over half of the participants perceived that they would feel “helpless or pessimistic” (56%), “inadequate or different” (59%), and “disadvantaged at job seeking” (59%), while older undergraduates had an adjusted 2.0 odds of holding the latter opinion (95% CI 1.1–3.5), compared to younger undergraduates. Conclusion: Hong Kong undergraduates showed a high awareness of PM but insufficient genetic knowledge and low interest in pursuing a career towards PM. They were generally aware of ethical issues of GT and especially concerned about patient privacy and data confidentiality. There was a predominance of pessimistic views towards unfavorable testing results. This study calls for the attention to evaluate education and talent development on genomics, and update existing legal frameworks on genetic testing in Hong Kong.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofHuman Genome Meeting 2018-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectEducation-
dc.subjectEthical-
dc.subjectGenetic testing-
dc.subjectLegal and Social Implications-
dc.subjectPersonalized medicine-
dc.subjectPharmacogenomics-
dc.titlePerception of personalized medicine, pharmacogenomics, and genetic testing among undergraduates in Hong Kong -
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s40246-021-00353-0-
dc.identifier.pmid34407885-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85112785938-
dc.identifier.volume15-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.issnl1473-9542-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats