File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277792
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85145425608
- PMID: 36584032
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: A qualitative systematic review of anonymous/unspecified living kidney and liver donors’ perspectives
Title | A qualitative systematic review of anonymous/unspecified living kidney and liver donors’ perspectives |
---|---|
Authors | Lim, Wen HuiChan, Kai EnNg, Cheng HanTan, Darren Jun HaoTay, Phoebe Wen LinChin, Yip HanYong, Jie NingXiao, JielingFu, Clarissa ElysiaNah, BenjaminTiong, Ho YeeSyn, NicholasDevi, KamalaGriva, KonstadinaMak, Loey Lung YiHuang, Daniel Q.Fung, JamesSiddiqui, Mohammad ShadabMuthiah, MarkTan, Eunice X.X. |
Issue Date | 30-Dec-2022 |
Publisher | Public Library of Science |
Citation | PLoS ONE, 2022, v. 17, n. 12 December, p. 562-562 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Objectives & background Anonymous live organ donors or unspecified donors are individuals willing to be organ donors for any transplant recipient with whom they have no biological or antecedent emotional relationship. Despite excellent recipient outcomes and the potential to help address organ scarcity, controversy surrounds the unconditional act of gifting one’s organs to an unrelated recipient. This qualitative systematic review provides insights into the first-hand experiences, motivations, and challenges that unspecified donors face. Methods A systematic search was conducted on Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science database for qualitative literature regarding unspecified living donors’ motivations and experiences in liver and kidney transplantation. An inductive thematic analysis was conducted to generate themes and supportive subthemes. Results 12 studies were included. The four major themes were (i) motivations, (ii) perception of risks, (iii) donor support, and (iv) benefits of donation. Unspecified donors demonstrated a deep sense of social responsibility but tended to underestimate health risks in favour of benefits for recipients. Despite the lack of emotional support from family and friends, the decision to donate was a resolute personal decision for donors. Majority benefitted emotionally and did not express regret. Conclusion This qualitative review bridges the gap in literature on unspecified living donor psychology and provides a comprehensive understanding of the decision-making matrix and experiences of donors. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/350362 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.9 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.839 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lim, Wen Hui | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, Kai En | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ng, Cheng Han | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tan, Darren Jun Hao | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tay, Phoebe Wen Lin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chin, Yip Han | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yong, Jie Ning | - |
dc.contributor.author | Xiao, Jieling | - |
dc.contributor.author | Fu, Clarissa Elysia | - |
dc.contributor.author | Nah, Benjamin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tiong, Ho Yee | - |
dc.contributor.author | Syn, Nicholas | - |
dc.contributor.author | Devi, Kamala | - |
dc.contributor.author | Griva, Konstadina | - |
dc.contributor.author | Mak, Loey Lung Yi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Huang, Daniel Q. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Fung, James | - |
dc.contributor.author | Siddiqui, Mohammad Shadab | - |
dc.contributor.author | Muthiah, Mark | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tan, Eunice X.X. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-29T00:31:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-10-29T00:31:08Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-12-30 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | PLoS ONE, 2022, v. 17, n. 12 December, p. 562-562 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1932-6203 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/350362 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <p>Objectives & background Anonymous live organ donors or unspecified donors are individuals willing to be organ donors for any transplant recipient with whom they have no biological or antecedent emotional relationship. Despite excellent recipient outcomes and the potential to help address organ scarcity, controversy surrounds the unconditional act of gifting one’s organs to an unrelated recipient. This qualitative systematic review provides insights into the first-hand experiences, motivations, and challenges that unspecified donors face. Methods A systematic search was conducted on Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science database for qualitative literature regarding unspecified living donors’ motivations and experiences in liver and kidney transplantation. An inductive thematic analysis was conducted to generate themes and supportive subthemes. Results 12 studies were included. The four major themes were (i) motivations, (ii) perception of risks, (iii) donor support, and (iv) benefits of donation. Unspecified donors demonstrated a deep sense of social responsibility but tended to underestimate health risks in favour of benefits for recipients. Despite the lack of emotional support from family and friends, the decision to donate was a resolute personal decision for donors. Majority benefitted emotionally and did not express regret. Conclusion This qualitative review bridges the gap in literature on unspecified living donor psychology and provides a comprehensive understanding of the decision-making matrix and experiences of donors.</p> | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Public Library of Science | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | PLoS ONE | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.title | A qualitative systematic review of anonymous/unspecified living kidney and liver donors’ perspectives | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1371/journal.pone.0277792 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 36584032 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85145425608 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 17 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 12 December | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 562 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 562 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1932-6203 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1932-6203 | - |