File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Comply or Explain: Do Firms Opportunistically Claim Trade Secrets in Mandatory Environmental Disclosure Programs?

TitleComply or Explain: Do Firms Opportunistically Claim Trade Secrets in Mandatory Environmental Disclosure Programs?
Authors
Keywordsavoidance strategy
environmental monitoring
fracking
innovation
mandatory environmental disclosure
misreporting
pollution
reporting regulation
trade secret
Issue Date15-Oct-2024
PublisherWiley
Citation
Journal of Accounting Research, 2024 How to Cite?
Abstract

This paper studies whether firms opportunistically make proprietary claims in mandatory environmental disclosure programs with trade secret exemption rules. Examining the mandatory chemical disclosure program in the fracking industry, I find evidence of opportunistic withholding of information among operators that are less likely to have trade secrets. Specifically, I find that these operators claim fewer chemicals as trade secrets when the operating site is in close proximity to water quality monitors. This is only observed among publicly traded operators that face a higher cost of societal backlash when disclosing pollutant information. Further analyses suggest that these operators are concerned about external environmental monitoring, which deters them from opportunistic information withholding. Regarding public and private operators that are more likely to have trade secrets, I do not find strong evidence that their information withholding varies with the monitoring conditions.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/350564
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.9
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 6.625

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJiang, Yile Anson-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-29T00:32:17Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-29T00:32:17Z-
dc.date.issued2024-10-15-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Accounting Research, 2024-
dc.identifier.issn0021-8456-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/350564-
dc.description.abstract<p>This paper studies whether firms opportunistically make proprietary claims in mandatory environmental disclosure programs with trade secret exemption rules. Examining the mandatory chemical disclosure program in the fracking industry, I find evidence of opportunistic withholding of information among operators that are less likely to have trade secrets. Specifically, I find that these operators claim fewer chemicals as trade secrets when the operating site is in close proximity to water quality monitors. This is only observed among publicly traded operators that face a higher cost of societal backlash when disclosing pollutant information. Further analyses suggest that these operators are concerned about external environmental monitoring, which deters them from opportunistic information withholding. Regarding public and private operators that are more likely to have trade secrets, I do not find strong evidence that their information withholding varies with the monitoring conditions.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Accounting Research-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectavoidance strategy-
dc.subjectenvironmental monitoring-
dc.subjectfracking-
dc.subjectinnovation-
dc.subjectmandatory environmental disclosure-
dc.subjectmisreporting-
dc.subjectpollution-
dc.subjectreporting regulation-
dc.subjecttrade secret-
dc.titleComply or Explain: Do Firms Opportunistically Claim Trade Secrets in Mandatory Environmental Disclosure Programs?-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1475-679X.12583-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85206391219-
dc.identifier.eissn1475-679X-
dc.identifier.issnl0021-8456-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats