File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Evaluating Virtual Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Radiation Therapy: A Retrospective Analysis for Primary Gross Tumor Delineation

TitleEvaluating Virtual Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Radiation Therapy: A Retrospective Analysis for Primary Gross Tumor Delineation
Authors
Issue Date2-Jul-2024
PublisherElsevier
Citation
International Journal of Radiation Oncology - Biology - Physics, 2024 How to Cite?
Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the potential of virtual contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (VCE-MRI) for gross-tumor-volume (GTV) delineation of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) using multi-institutional data. Methods and Materials: This study retrospectively retrieved T1-weighted (T1w), T2-weighted (T2w) MRI, gadolinium-based contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI), and planning computed tomography (CT) of 348 biopsy-proven NPC patients from 3 oncology centers. A multimodality-guided synergistic neural network (MMgSN-Net) was trained using 288 patients to leverage complementary features in T1w and T2w MRI for VCE-MRI synthesis, which was independently evaluated using 60 patients. Three board-certified radiation oncologists and 2 medical physicists participated in clinical evaluations in 3 aspects: image quality assessment of the synthetic VCE-MRI, VCE-MRI in assisting target volume delineation, and effectiveness of VCE-MRI-based contours in treatment planning. The image quality assessment includes distinguishability between VCE-MRI and CE-MRI, clarity of tumor-to-normal tissue interface, and veracity of contrast enhancement in tumor invasion risk areas. Primary tumor delineation and treatment planning were manually performed by radiation oncologists and medical physicists, respectively. Results: The mean accuracy to distinguish VCE-MRI from CE-MRI was 31.67%; no significant difference was observed in the clarity of tumor-to-normal tissue interface between VCE-MRI and CE-MRI; for the veracity of contrast enhancement in tumor invasion risk areas, an accuracy of 85.8% was obtained. The image quality assessment results suggest that the image quality of VCE-MRI is highly similar to real CE-MRI. The mean dosimetric difference of planning target volumes was less than 1 Gy. Conclusions: The VCE-MRI is highly promising to replace the use of gadolinium-based CE-MRI in tumor delineation of NPC patients.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/350770
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 6.4
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.992

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLi, Wen-
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Dan-
dc.contributor.authorZeng, Guangping-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Zhi-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Zhou-
dc.contributor.authorLam, Saikit-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Andy Lai Yin-
dc.contributor.authorRen, Ge-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Chenyang-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Xi-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Francis Kar Ho-
dc.contributor.authorAu, Kwok Hung-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Victor Ho Fun-
dc.contributor.authorXie, Yaoqin-
dc.contributor.authorQin, Wenjian-
dc.contributor.authorCai, Jing-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Tian-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-02T00:37:59Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-02T00:37:59Z-
dc.date.issued2024-07-02-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology - Biology - Physics, 2024-
dc.identifier.issn0360-3016-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/350770-
dc.description.abstract<p>Purpose: To investigate the potential of virtual contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (VCE-MRI) for gross-tumor-volume (GTV) delineation of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) using multi-institutional data. Methods and Materials: This study retrospectively retrieved T1-weighted (T1w), T2-weighted (T2w) MRI, gadolinium-based contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI), and planning computed tomography (CT) of 348 biopsy-proven NPC patients from 3 oncology centers. A multimodality-guided synergistic neural network (MMgSN-Net) was trained using 288 patients to leverage complementary features in T1w and T2w MRI for VCE-MRI synthesis, which was independently evaluated using 60 patients. Three board-certified radiation oncologists and 2 medical physicists participated in clinical evaluations in 3 aspects: image quality assessment of the synthetic VCE-MRI, VCE-MRI in assisting target volume delineation, and effectiveness of VCE-MRI-based contours in treatment planning. The image quality assessment includes distinguishability between VCE-MRI and CE-MRI, clarity of tumor-to-normal tissue interface, and veracity of contrast enhancement in tumor invasion risk areas. Primary tumor delineation and treatment planning were manually performed by radiation oncologists and medical physicists, respectively. Results: The mean accuracy to distinguish VCE-MRI from CE-MRI was 31.67%; no significant difference was observed in the clarity of tumor-to-normal tissue interface between VCE-MRI and CE-MRI; for the veracity of contrast enhancement in tumor invasion risk areas, an accuracy of 85.8% was obtained. The image quality assessment results suggest that the image quality of VCE-MRI is highly similar to real CE-MRI. The mean dosimetric difference of planning target volumes was less than 1 Gy. Conclusions: The VCE-MRI is highly promising to replace the use of gadolinium-based CE-MRI in tumor delineation of NPC patients.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology - Biology - Physics-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleEvaluating Virtual Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Radiation Therapy: A Retrospective Analysis for Primary Gross Tumor Delineation-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.06.015-
dc.identifier.pmid38964419-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85202766697-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-355X-
dc.identifier.issnl0360-3016-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats