File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.03.005
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85195020319
- PMID: 38844309
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma previously treated with sorafenib: 5-year results from CheckMate 040
Title | Nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma previously treated with sorafenib: 5-year results from CheckMate 040 |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | advanced hepatocellular carcinoma checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy ipilimumab nivolumab sorafenib |
Issue Date | 1-Jun-2024 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Citation | Annals of Oncology, 2024, v. 35, n. 6, p. 537-548 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Background: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab demonstrated promising clinical activity and durable responses in sorafenib-treated patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the CheckMate 040 study at 30.7-month median follow-up. Here, we present 5-year results from this cohort. Patients and methods: Patients were randomized 1: 1: 1 to arm A [nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg Q3W (four doses)] or arm B [nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg Q3W (four doses)], each followed by nivolumab 240 mg Q2W, or arm C (nivolumab 3 mg/kg Q2W plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg Q6W). The primary objectives were safety, tolerability, investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DOR) per RECIST version 1.1. Results: A total of 148 patients were randomized across treatment arms. At 60-month minimum follow-up (62.6-month median follow-up), the ORR was 34% (n = 17), 27% (n = 13), and 29% (n = 14) in arms A, B, and C, respectively. The median DOR was 51.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 12.6 months-not estimable (NE)], 15.2 months (95% CI 7.1 months-NE), and 21.7 months (95% CI 4.2 months-NE), respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 22.2 months (34/50; 95% CI 9.4-54.8 months) in arm A, 12.5 months (38/49; 95% CI 7.6-16.4 months) in arm B, and 12.7 months (40/49; 95% CI 7.4-30.5 months) in arm C; 60-month OS rates were 29%, 19%, and 21%, respectively. In an exploratory analysis of OS by response (6-month landmark), the median OS was meaningfully longer for responders versus nonresponders for all arms. No new safety signals were identified with longer follow-up. There were no new discontinuations due to immune-mediated adverse events since the primary analysis. Conclusions: Consistent with the primary analysis, the arm A regimen of nivolumab plus ipilimumab continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful responses and long-term survival benefit, with no new safety signals in patients with advanced HCC following sorafenib treatment, further supporting its use as a second-line treatment in these patients. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/351070 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 56.7 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 13.942 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Melero, I. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yau, T. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kang, Y. K. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, T. Y. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Santoro, A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sangro, B. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kudo, M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hou, M. M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Matilla, A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tovoli, F. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Knox, J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | He, A. R. | - |
dc.contributor.author | El-Rayes, B. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Acosta-Rivera, M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lim, H. Y. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Soleymani, S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yao, J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Neely, J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tschaika, M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hsu, C. | - |
dc.contributor.author | El-Khoueiry, A. B. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-11-09T00:35:34Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-11-09T00:35:34Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024-06-01 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Annals of Oncology, 2024, v. 35, n. 6, p. 537-548 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0923-7534 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/351070 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab demonstrated promising clinical activity and durable responses in sorafenib-treated patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the CheckMate 040 study at 30.7-month median follow-up. Here, we present 5-year results from this cohort. Patients and methods: Patients were randomized 1: 1: 1 to arm A [nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg Q3W (four doses)] or arm B [nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg Q3W (four doses)], each followed by nivolumab 240 mg Q2W, or arm C (nivolumab 3 mg/kg Q2W plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg Q6W). The primary objectives were safety, tolerability, investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DOR) per RECIST version 1.1. Results: A total of 148 patients were randomized across treatment arms. At 60-month minimum follow-up (62.6-month median follow-up), the ORR was 34% (n = 17), 27% (n = 13), and 29% (n = 14) in arms A, B, and C, respectively. The median DOR was 51.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 12.6 months-not estimable (NE)], 15.2 months (95% CI 7.1 months-NE), and 21.7 months (95% CI 4.2 months-NE), respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 22.2 months (34/50; 95% CI 9.4-54.8 months) in arm A, 12.5 months (38/49; 95% CI 7.6-16.4 months) in arm B, and 12.7 months (40/49; 95% CI 7.4-30.5 months) in arm C; 60-month OS rates were 29%, 19%, and 21%, respectively. In an exploratory analysis of OS by response (6-month landmark), the median OS was meaningfully longer for responders versus nonresponders for all arms. No new safety signals were identified with longer follow-up. There were no new discontinuations due to immune-mediated adverse events since the primary analysis. Conclusions: Consistent with the primary analysis, the arm A regimen of nivolumab plus ipilimumab continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful responses and long-term survival benefit, with no new safety signals in patients with advanced HCC following sorafenib treatment, further supporting its use as a second-line treatment in these patients. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Annals of Oncology | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | advanced hepatocellular carcinoma | - |
dc.subject | checkpoint inhibitor | - |
dc.subject | immunotherapy | - |
dc.subject | ipilimumab | - |
dc.subject | nivolumab | - |
dc.subject | sorafenib | - |
dc.title | Nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma previously treated with sorafenib: 5-year results from CheckMate 040 | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.03.005 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 38844309 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85195020319 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 35 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 6 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 537 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 548 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1569-8041 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0923-7534 | - |