File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1163/15685322-10705001
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85121923158
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: The Construction of Territories in the Qin Empire
Title | The Construction of Territories in the Qin Empire |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | "Coreperiphery" model Construction of space Qin empire Territorial control Territoriality |
Issue Date | 2021 |
Citation | T'oung Pao, 2021, v. 107, n. 5, p. 509-554 How to Cite? |
Abstract | This essay revisits the territoriality of the Qin empire by examining the spatial division underneath its commandery-county system. With the universal implementation of centralized administration, scholars usually believe that the Qin empire exerted strong control across its territories. But new Qin sources suggest otherwise. It is evident that the Qin regime devised multiple schemes to structure its empire into three concentric zones with asymmetrical political relations. The respective features and functions of these zones were consonant with those of the center, semiperiphery, and periphery in the "core-periphery"model. The regime's spatial strategy can be understood as a compromise made to accommodate the diverse landscape in different parts of its vast empire, especially in the newly conquered regions. This reminds us that despite having installed the unitary commandery-county system, the territorial control wielded by the Qin regime in its new territories was tenuous at best. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/351436 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 0.6 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.320 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Tong, Chun Fung | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-11-20T03:56:16Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-11-20T03:56:16Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | T'oung Pao, 2021, v. 107, n. 5, p. 509-554 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0082-5433 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/351436 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This essay revisits the territoriality of the Qin empire by examining the spatial division underneath its commandery-county system. With the universal implementation of centralized administration, scholars usually believe that the Qin empire exerted strong control across its territories. But new Qin sources suggest otherwise. It is evident that the Qin regime devised multiple schemes to structure its empire into three concentric zones with asymmetrical political relations. The respective features and functions of these zones were consonant with those of the center, semiperiphery, and periphery in the "core-periphery"model. The regime's spatial strategy can be understood as a compromise made to accommodate the diverse landscape in different parts of its vast empire, especially in the newly conquered regions. This reminds us that despite having installed the unitary commandery-county system, the territorial control wielded by the Qin regime in its new territories was tenuous at best. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | T'oung Pao | - |
dc.subject | "Coreperiphery" model | - |
dc.subject | Construction of space | - |
dc.subject | Qin empire | - |
dc.subject | Territorial control | - |
dc.subject | Territoriality | - |
dc.title | The Construction of Territories in the Qin Empire | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1163/15685322-10705001 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85121923158 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 107 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 5 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 509 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 554 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1568-5322 | - |