File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Charting the Research Terrain for Large Old Trees: Findings from a Quantitative Bibliometric Examination in the Twenty-First Century

TitleCharting the Research Terrain for Large Old Trees: Findings from a Quantitative Bibliometric Examination in the Twenty-First Century
Authors
Keywordsbibliometrics
large old trees (LOT)
research frontier
research hotspot
VOSviewer
Issue Date2024
Citation
Forests, 2024, v. 15, n. 2, article no. 373 How to Cite?
AbstractDespite their relatively small numbers, large old trees play disproportionately important roles in global biodiversity and ecosystem functions. There is a lack of systematic reviews and quantitative analyses of the accumulated literature. Understanding the research context and evolution could pump prime research and conservation endeavors. Using the comprehensive Web of Science, we applied VOSviewer (1.6.19) and CiteSpace (6.1R2) bibliometric software to examine the large old tree research field in 2000–2022. The queries of the bibliographic database generated quantitative–visual depictions in the form of knowledge maps. The nodes denote research intensity, and inter-node linkages denote the pathways and frequencies of collaborative activities. The research outputs differed significantly in terms of regions, countries, institutions, high-citation articles, productive researchers, hot topics, and research frontiers. Conspicuous spatial disparities were displayed, with the U.S.A., China, and Australia leading in publication counts and a cluster of European countries making considerable collective contributions. The research collaboration demonstrated a dichotomy: European countries networked more by geographical propinquity, and the top three countries connected by long-distance leap-frog jumps. The entrenched discrepancies between the endowed developed domains vis-à-vis the deprived developing domains were clearly expressed. The research productivity progressed through three stages: initial, growth, and flourishing. The leading institutions, researchers, and highly cited papers were recognized. The keyword analysis pinpointed diverse research hotspots: growth dynamics, conservation and management, ecological functions, and environmental response. This study informs recommendations for future research directions and cooperation on longevity mechanisms, evolutionary adaptation, dynamic monitoring, and temporal–spatial patterns. The integrated application of GIS, machine learning, and big data technologies could strengthen research capability.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/351665

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorXie, Chunping-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Chang-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Dawei-
dc.contributor.authorJim, C. Y.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-21T06:38:23Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-21T06:38:23Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationForests, 2024, v. 15, n. 2, article no. 373-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/351665-
dc.description.abstractDespite their relatively small numbers, large old trees play disproportionately important roles in global biodiversity and ecosystem functions. There is a lack of systematic reviews and quantitative analyses of the accumulated literature. Understanding the research context and evolution could pump prime research and conservation endeavors. Using the comprehensive Web of Science, we applied VOSviewer (1.6.19) and CiteSpace (6.1R2) bibliometric software to examine the large old tree research field in 2000–2022. The queries of the bibliographic database generated quantitative–visual depictions in the form of knowledge maps. The nodes denote research intensity, and inter-node linkages denote the pathways and frequencies of collaborative activities. The research outputs differed significantly in terms of regions, countries, institutions, high-citation articles, productive researchers, hot topics, and research frontiers. Conspicuous spatial disparities were displayed, with the U.S.A., China, and Australia leading in publication counts and a cluster of European countries making considerable collective contributions. The research collaboration demonstrated a dichotomy: European countries networked more by geographical propinquity, and the top three countries connected by long-distance leap-frog jumps. The entrenched discrepancies between the endowed developed domains vis-à-vis the deprived developing domains were clearly expressed. The research productivity progressed through three stages: initial, growth, and flourishing. The leading institutions, researchers, and highly cited papers were recognized. The keyword analysis pinpointed diverse research hotspots: growth dynamics, conservation and management, ecological functions, and environmental response. This study informs recommendations for future research directions and cooperation on longevity mechanisms, evolutionary adaptation, dynamic monitoring, and temporal–spatial patterns. The integrated application of GIS, machine learning, and big data technologies could strengthen research capability.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofForests-
dc.subjectbibliometrics-
dc.subjectlarge old trees (LOT)-
dc.subjectresearch frontier-
dc.subjectresearch hotspot-
dc.subjectVOSviewer-
dc.titleCharting the Research Terrain for Large Old Trees: Findings from a Quantitative Bibliometric Examination in the Twenty-First Century-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/f15020373-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85185828091-
dc.identifier.volume15-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 373-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 373-
dc.identifier.eissn1999-4907-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats