File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101395
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85202585178
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Will generative AI replace teachers in higher education? A study of teacher and student perceptions
Title | Will generative AI replace teachers in higher education? A study of teacher and student perceptions |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | AI Literacy ChatGPT Generative AI Holistic competencies Social-emotional competencies |
Issue Date | 1-Dec-2024 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Citation | Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2024, v. 83 How to Cite? |
Abstract | This paper evaluates the potential of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education, specifically its capacity to replace or assist human teachers. By reviewing relevant literature and analysing survey data from students and teachers, this mixed-methods study provides a comprehensive perspective on the future role of educators in the face of advancing generative AI technologies. An online survey was conducted to explore the perceptions of 399 university students and 184 teachers across different disciplines in eight higher education institutions in Hong Kong concerning the use of generative AI technologies. Findings suggest that although some believed generative AI may eventually replace teachers, the majority of participants argued that human teachers possess unique qualities, including critical thinking and emotions, which make them irreplaceable. Similarly, findings also emphasized the importance of social-emotional competencies developed through human interactions, something which generative AI technologies cannot currently replicate. Crucially, this study further found that students value and respect their human teachers, even as generative AI becomes more prevalent. As such, the authors propose that teachers can seek to effectively integrate generative AI to enhance teaching and learning without viewing it as their replacement. To do so, they must understand how generative AI can work well with teachers and students, avoid potential pitfalls, develop AI literacy, and address practical issues including ethics and privacy. Recommendations are offered on how universities, teachers, and students can adopt generative AI technologies in an approach that balances the strengths of human educators with generative AI technologies. As the future of education lies in the synergy between human teachers and generative AI, teachers, students, and universities should all understand and refine their unique qualities in order to effectively navigate the integration of generative AI, ensuring well-rounded and impactful learning experiences. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/351863 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.6 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.084 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chan, Cecilia Ka Yuk | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tsi, Louisa H.Y. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-12-04T00:35:11Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-12-04T00:35:11Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024-12-01 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2024, v. 83 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0191-491X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/351863 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper evaluates the potential of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education, specifically its capacity to replace or assist human teachers. By reviewing relevant literature and analysing survey data from students and teachers, this mixed-methods study provides a comprehensive perspective on the future role of educators in the face of advancing generative AI technologies. An online survey was conducted to explore the perceptions of 399 university students and 184 teachers across different disciplines in eight higher education institutions in Hong Kong concerning the use of generative AI technologies. Findings suggest that although some believed generative AI may eventually replace teachers, the majority of participants argued that human teachers possess unique qualities, including critical thinking and emotions, which make them irreplaceable. Similarly, findings also emphasized the importance of social-emotional competencies developed through human interactions, something which generative AI technologies cannot currently replicate. Crucially, this study further found that students value and respect their human teachers, even as generative AI becomes more prevalent. As such, the authors propose that teachers can seek to effectively integrate generative AI to enhance teaching and learning without viewing it as their replacement. To do so, they must understand how generative AI can work well with teachers and students, avoid potential pitfalls, develop AI literacy, and address practical issues including ethics and privacy. Recommendations are offered on how universities, teachers, and students can adopt generative AI technologies in an approach that balances the strengths of human educators with generative AI technologies. As the future of education lies in the synergy between human teachers and generative AI, teachers, students, and universities should all understand and refine their unique qualities in order to effectively navigate the integration of generative AI, ensuring well-rounded and impactful learning experiences. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Studies in Educational Evaluation | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | AI Literacy | - |
dc.subject | ChatGPT | - |
dc.subject | Generative AI | - |
dc.subject | Holistic competencies | - |
dc.subject | Social-emotional competencies | - |
dc.title | Will generative AI replace teachers in higher education? A study of teacher and student perceptions | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101395 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85202585178 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 83 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1879-2529 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0191-491X | - |