File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Will generative AI replace teachers in higher education? A study of teacher and student perceptions

TitleWill generative AI replace teachers in higher education? A study of teacher and student perceptions
Authors
KeywordsAI Literacy
ChatGPT
Generative AI
Holistic competencies
Social-emotional competencies
Issue Date1-Dec-2024
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2024, v. 83 How to Cite?
AbstractThis paper evaluates the potential of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education, specifically its capacity to replace or assist human teachers. By reviewing relevant literature and analysing survey data from students and teachers, this mixed-methods study provides a comprehensive perspective on the future role of educators in the face of advancing generative AI technologies. An online survey was conducted to explore the perceptions of 399 university students and 184 teachers across different disciplines in eight higher education institutions in Hong Kong concerning the use of generative AI technologies. Findings suggest that although some believed generative AI may eventually replace teachers, the majority of participants argued that human teachers possess unique qualities, including critical thinking and emotions, which make them irreplaceable. Similarly, findings also emphasized the importance of social-emotional competencies developed through human interactions, something which generative AI technologies cannot currently replicate. Crucially, this study further found that students value and respect their human teachers, even as generative AI becomes more prevalent. As such, the authors propose that teachers can seek to effectively integrate generative AI to enhance teaching and learning without viewing it as their replacement. To do so, they must understand how generative AI can work well with teachers and students, avoid potential pitfalls, develop AI literacy, and address practical issues including ethics and privacy. Recommendations are offered on how universities, teachers, and students can adopt generative AI technologies in an approach that balances the strengths of human educators with generative AI technologies. As the future of education lies in the synergy between human teachers and generative AI, teachers, students, and universities should all understand and refine their unique qualities in order to effectively navigate the integration of generative AI, ensuring well-rounded and impactful learning experiences.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/351863
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.084

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChan, Cecilia Ka Yuk-
dc.contributor.authorTsi, Louisa H.Y.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-04T00:35:11Z-
dc.date.available2024-12-04T00:35:11Z-
dc.date.issued2024-12-01-
dc.identifier.citationStudies in Educational Evaluation, 2024, v. 83-
dc.identifier.issn0191-491X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/351863-
dc.description.abstractThis paper evaluates the potential of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education, specifically its capacity to replace or assist human teachers. By reviewing relevant literature and analysing survey data from students and teachers, this mixed-methods study provides a comprehensive perspective on the future role of educators in the face of advancing generative AI technologies. An online survey was conducted to explore the perceptions of 399 university students and 184 teachers across different disciplines in eight higher education institutions in Hong Kong concerning the use of generative AI technologies. Findings suggest that although some believed generative AI may eventually replace teachers, the majority of participants argued that human teachers possess unique qualities, including critical thinking and emotions, which make them irreplaceable. Similarly, findings also emphasized the importance of social-emotional competencies developed through human interactions, something which generative AI technologies cannot currently replicate. Crucially, this study further found that students value and respect their human teachers, even as generative AI becomes more prevalent. As such, the authors propose that teachers can seek to effectively integrate generative AI to enhance teaching and learning without viewing it as their replacement. To do so, they must understand how generative AI can work well with teachers and students, avoid potential pitfalls, develop AI literacy, and address practical issues including ethics and privacy. Recommendations are offered on how universities, teachers, and students can adopt generative AI technologies in an approach that balances the strengths of human educators with generative AI technologies. As the future of education lies in the synergy between human teachers and generative AI, teachers, students, and universities should all understand and refine their unique qualities in order to effectively navigate the integration of generative AI, ensuring well-rounded and impactful learning experiences.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofStudies in Educational Evaluation-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectAI Literacy-
dc.subjectChatGPT-
dc.subjectGenerative AI-
dc.subjectHolistic competencies-
dc.subjectSocial-emotional competencies-
dc.titleWill generative AI replace teachers in higher education? A study of teacher and student perceptions-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101395-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85202585178-
dc.identifier.volume83-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-2529-
dc.identifier.issnl0191-491X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats