File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Conference Paper: Effectiveness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir in non-hospitalized adults with COVID-19: systematic review
Title | Effectiveness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir in non-hospitalized adults with COVID-19: systematic review |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 12-Oct-2024 |
Abstract | To determine the effectiveness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir among vaccinated and unvaccinated non-hospitalized adults with COVID-19. Methods: Observational studies of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or molnupiravir compared to no antiviral drug treatment for COVID-19 in non-hospitalized adults with data on vaccination status were included. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, WHO COVID-19 Research database, and medRxiv for reports published between 1 January 2022 and 8 November 2023. The primary outcome was a composite of hospitalization or mortality up to 35 days after COVID-19 diagnosis. Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-I. Risk ratios (RR), hazard ratios (HR) and risk differences (RD) were separately estimated using random-effects models. Results: We included 30 cohort studies on adults treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (n=462,279) and molnupiravir (n=48,008) in the systematic review and 22 studies in the quantitative synthesis. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir probably reduced the composite outcome (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.55–0.70; I²=0%; moderate certainty) with no evidence of effect modification by vaccination status (Psubgroup=0.47). In five studies, RD estimates against the composite outcome for nirmatrelvir/ritonavir were 1.21% (95% CI 0.57% to 1.84%) in vaccinated and 1.72% (95% CI 0.59% to 2.85%) in unvaccinated subgroups. Molnupiravir may slightly reduce the composite outcome (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.67–0.85; I²=32%; low certainty). Evidence of effect modification by vaccination status was inconsistent among studies reporting different effect measures (RR Psubgroup=0.78; HR Psubgroup=0.08). In two studies, RD against the composite outcome for molnupiravir were −0.01% (95% CI −1.13% to 1.10%) in vaccinated and 1.73% (95% CI −2.08% to 5.53%) in unvaccinated subgroups. Conclusion: Among cohort studies of non-hospitalized adults with COVID-19, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir is effective against the composite outcome of severe COVID-19 independent of vaccination status. Further research and a reassessment of molnupiravir use among vaccinated adults are warranted. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/352062 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Blais, JE | - |
dc.contributor.author | Mesfin, YM | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kibret, KT | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tegegne, TK | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cowling, BJ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wu, P | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-12-12T00:35:21Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-12-12T00:35:21Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024-10-12 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/352062 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <p>To determine the effectiveness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir among vaccinated and unvaccinated non-hospitalized adults with COVID-19. Methods: Observational studies of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or molnupiravir compared to no antiviral drug treatment for COVID-19 in non-hospitalized adults with data on vaccination status were included. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, WHO COVID-19 Research database, and medRxiv for reports published between 1 January 2022 and 8 November 2023. The primary outcome was a composite of hospitalization or mortality up to 35 days after COVID-19 diagnosis. Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-I. Risk ratios (RR), hazard ratios (HR) and risk differences (RD) were separately estimated using random-effects models. Results: We included 30 cohort studies on adults treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (n=462,279) and molnupiravir (n=48,008) in the systematic review and 22 studies in the quantitative synthesis. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir probably reduced the composite outcome (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.55–0.70; I²=0%; moderate certainty) with no evidence of effect modification by vaccination status (Psubgroup=0.47). In five studies, RD estimates against the composite outcome for nirmatrelvir/ritonavir were 1.21% (95% CI 0.57% to 1.84%) in vaccinated and 1.72% (95% CI 0.59% to 2.85%) in unvaccinated subgroups. Molnupiravir may slightly reduce the composite outcome (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.67–0.85; I²=32%; low certainty). Evidence of effect modification by vaccination status was inconsistent among studies reporting different effect measures (RR Psubgroup=0.78; HR Psubgroup=0.08). In two studies, RD against the composite outcome for molnupiravir were −0.01% (95% CI −1.13% to 1.10%) in vaccinated and 1.73% (95% CI −2.08% to 5.53%) in unvaccinated subgroups. Conclusion: Among cohort studies of non-hospitalized adults with COVID-19, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir is effective against the composite outcome of severe COVID-19 independent of vaccination status. Further research and a reassessment of molnupiravir use among vaccinated adults are warranted.<br></p> | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | 16th Asian Conference on Pharmacoepidemiology (12/10/2024-14/10/2024, Tokyo) | - |
dc.title | Effectiveness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir in non-hospitalized adults with COVID-19: systematic review | - |
dc.type | Conference_Paper | - |