File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Blue-light imaging or narrow-band imaging for proximal colonic lesions: a prospective randomized tandem colonoscopy study

TitleBlue-light imaging or narrow-band imaging for proximal colonic lesions: a prospective randomized tandem colonoscopy study
Authors
Issue Date2023
Citation
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2023, v. 98, n. 5, p. 813-821.e3 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground and Aims: Blue-light imaging (BLI) is a new image-enhanced endoscopy with a wavelength filter similar to narrow-band imaging (NBI). We compared the 2 with white-light imaging (WLI) on proximal colonic lesion detection and miss rates. Methods: In this 3-arm prospective randomized study with tandem examination of the proximal colon, we enrolled patients aged ≥40 years. Eligible patients were randomized in 1:1:1 ratio to receive BLI, NBI, or WLI during the first withdrawal from the proximal colon. The second withdrawal was performed using WLI in all patients. Primary outcomes were proximal polyp (pPDRs) and adenoma (pADRs) detection rates. Secondary outcomes were miss rates of proximal lesions found on tandem examination. Results: Of 901 patients included (mean age, 64.7 years; 52.9% men), 48.1% underwent colonoscopy for screening or surveillance. The corresponding pPDRs of the BLI, NBI, and WLI groups were 45.8%, 41.6, and 36.6%, whereas the corresponding pADRs were 36.6%, 33.8%, and 28.3%. There was a significant difference in pPDR and pADR between BLI and WLI groups (difference, 9.2% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 3.3-16.9] and 8.3% [95% CI, 2.7-15.9]) and between NBI and WLI groups (difference, 5.0% [95% CI, 1.4-12.9] and 5.6% [95% CI, 2.1-13.3]). Proximal adenoma miss rates were significantly lower with BLI (19.4%) than with WLI (27.4%; difference, –8.0%; 95% CI, –15.8 to –.1) but not between NBI (27.2%) and WLI. Conclusions: Both BLI and NBI were superior to WLI on detecting proximal colonic lesions, but only BLI had lower proximal adenoma miss rates than WLI. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03696992.)
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/352383
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 6.7
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.749

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLeung, Wai K.-
dc.contributor.authorTsui, Vivien Wai Man-
dc.contributor.authorMak, Loey Lung Yi-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Michael Ka Shing-
dc.contributor.authorHui, Cynthia Ka Yin-
dc.contributor.authorLam, Carla Pui Mei-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Siu Yin-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Kevin Sze Hang-
dc.contributor.authorKo, Michael Kwan Lung-
dc.contributor.authorTo, Elvis Wai Pan-
dc.contributor.authorGuo, Chuan Guo-
dc.contributor.authorLui, Thomas Ka Luen-
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-16T03:58:35Z-
dc.date.available2024-12-16T03:58:35Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2023, v. 98, n. 5, p. 813-821.e3-
dc.identifier.issn0016-5107-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/352383-
dc.description.abstractBackground and Aims: Blue-light imaging (BLI) is a new image-enhanced endoscopy with a wavelength filter similar to narrow-band imaging (NBI). We compared the 2 with white-light imaging (WLI) on proximal colonic lesion detection and miss rates. Methods: In this 3-arm prospective randomized study with tandem examination of the proximal colon, we enrolled patients aged ≥40 years. Eligible patients were randomized in 1:1:1 ratio to receive BLI, NBI, or WLI during the first withdrawal from the proximal colon. The second withdrawal was performed using WLI in all patients. Primary outcomes were proximal polyp (pPDRs) and adenoma (pADRs) detection rates. Secondary outcomes were miss rates of proximal lesions found on tandem examination. Results: Of 901 patients included (mean age, 64.7 years; 52.9% men), 48.1% underwent colonoscopy for screening or surveillance. The corresponding pPDRs of the BLI, NBI, and WLI groups were 45.8%, 41.6, and 36.6%, whereas the corresponding pADRs were 36.6%, 33.8%, and 28.3%. There was a significant difference in pPDR and pADR between BLI and WLI groups (difference, 9.2% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 3.3-16.9] and 8.3% [95% CI, 2.7-15.9]) and between NBI and WLI groups (difference, 5.0% [95% CI, 1.4-12.9] and 5.6% [95% CI, 2.1-13.3]). Proximal adenoma miss rates were significantly lower with BLI (19.4%) than with WLI (27.4%; difference, –8.0%; 95% CI, –15.8 to –.1) but not between NBI (27.2%) and WLI. Conclusions: Both BLI and NBI were superior to WLI on detecting proximal colonic lesions, but only BLI had lower proximal adenoma miss rates than WLI. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03696992.)-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofGastrointestinal Endoscopy-
dc.titleBlue-light imaging or narrow-band imaging for proximal colonic lesions: a prospective randomized tandem colonoscopy study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.gie.2023.06.004-
dc.identifier.pmid37307902-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85171632987-
dc.identifier.volume98-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.identifier.spage813-
dc.identifier.epage821.e3-
dc.identifier.eissn1097-6779-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats