File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The use of 5% lidocaine medicated plaster for acute postoperative pain after gynecological surgery: A pilot randomized controlled feasibility trial

TitleThe use of 5% lidocaine medicated plaster for acute postoperative pain after gynecological surgery: A pilot randomized controlled feasibility trial
Authors
KeywordsLocal anesthetics
Pain management
Transdermal patch
Issue Date2018
Citation
Medicine (United States), 2018, v. 97, n. 39, article no. e12582 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives: To examine the feasibility and potential efficacy of 5% lidocaine medicated plaster for acute postoperative pain in a parallel, blinded, randomized controlled pilot trial. Methods: Twenty-eight women undergoing elective gynecological surgery with midline incisions were randomly allocated 5% lidocaine medicated patch (Lignopad) or placebo plasters. Postoperative pain at rest and on movement at 24 hours were the primary study endpoints, with secondary endpoints of postoperative pain within the first 48 hours, cumulative morphine consumption (mg), predicted peak flow rate (PFR) (%) and adverse effects. We assessed pain scores at rest and on movement using the visual analogue scale (0-100). Results: The lidocaine patch group had lower postoperative pain scores at rest at 24 hours (mean difference [MD] 15.1, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 28.3 to 2.0; P = .024) but not on movement at 24 hours (MD 6.4, 95% CI 22.7 to 9.9; P = .445). Compared to placebo, lidocaine may slightly lower cumulative morphine consumption (mg) over time (MD 3.4, 95% CI 6.9 to 0.2; group∗time interaction P = .065). The difference in improvement in the PFR over time after surgery between groups appeared small (group∗time P = .0980). No adverse effects occurred. Conclusions: Lidocaine patch may provide a clinically important reduction in postoperative pain intensity. A larger trial to confirm the efficacy and safety of lidocaine patch is feasible after modifying the inclusion criteria and collecting patient-centered outcomes, such as quality of recovery and patient satisfaction.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/352470
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.441

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLau, Lydia L.N.-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Cheuk Yin-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Anna-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Simon K.C.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-16T03:59:15Z-
dc.date.available2024-12-16T03:59:15Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationMedicine (United States), 2018, v. 97, n. 39, article no. e12582-
dc.identifier.issn0025-7974-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/352470-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To examine the feasibility and potential efficacy of 5% lidocaine medicated plaster for acute postoperative pain in a parallel, blinded, randomized controlled pilot trial. Methods: Twenty-eight women undergoing elective gynecological surgery with midline incisions were randomly allocated 5% lidocaine medicated patch (Lignopad) or placebo plasters. Postoperative pain at rest and on movement at 24 hours were the primary study endpoints, with secondary endpoints of postoperative pain within the first 48 hours, cumulative morphine consumption (mg), predicted peak flow rate (PFR) (%) and adverse effects. We assessed pain scores at rest and on movement using the visual analogue scale (0-100). Results: The lidocaine patch group had lower postoperative pain scores at rest at 24 hours (mean difference [MD] 15.1, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 28.3 to 2.0; P = .024) but not on movement at 24 hours (MD 6.4, 95% CI 22.7 to 9.9; P = .445). Compared to placebo, lidocaine may slightly lower cumulative morphine consumption (mg) over time (MD 3.4, 95% CI 6.9 to 0.2; group∗time interaction P = .065). The difference in improvement in the PFR over time after surgery between groups appeared small (group∗time P = .0980). No adverse effects occurred. Conclusions: Lidocaine patch may provide a clinically important reduction in postoperative pain intensity. A larger trial to confirm the efficacy and safety of lidocaine patch is feasible after modifying the inclusion criteria and collecting patient-centered outcomes, such as quality of recovery and patient satisfaction.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofMedicine (United States)-
dc.subjectLocal anesthetics-
dc.subjectPain management-
dc.subjectTransdermal patch-
dc.titleThe use of 5% lidocaine medicated plaster for acute postoperative pain after gynecological surgery: A pilot randomized controlled feasibility trial-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/MD.0000000000012582-
dc.identifier.pmid30278568-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85054420017-
dc.identifier.volume97-
dc.identifier.issue39-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. e12582-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. e12582-
dc.identifier.eissn1536-5964-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats