File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Enhancing nursing students' clinical competency using a multi-patient simulation learning model: A randomized controlled study

TitleEnhancing nursing students' clinical competency using a multi-patient simulation learning model: A randomized controlled study
Authors
KeywordsClinical competence
High-fidelity simulation
Multi-patient simulation
Nursing education
Prioritization competency
Randomized controlled trial
Issue Date1-Sep-2024
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Nurse Education Today, 2024, v. 140 How to Cite?
Abstract

Background
For nurses, clinical competency is paramount in ensuring that patients receive safe, high-quality care. Multi-patient simulation (MPS) in nursing education is gaining attention, and evidence shows its suitability for real-life situations. MPS can be an effective solution for nurses' continuing clinical education.
Objectives
This project compares the effectiveness of MPS (involving both a standardized patient and a high fidelity simulator) and a single high-fidelity simulation (single HFS; only involving a high fidelity simulator) for enhancing the clinical competency of nursing students.
Design
A stratified, permuted, block randomized controlled study design was used.
Settings and participants.
Sixty undergraduate nursing students in years 3, 4, and 5 were selected to participate. Subgroups with each comprising three undergraduate nursing students from different years were formed.
Methods
The participants were randomized to receive either an MPS (intervention group) or single HFS (control group) for 1 day; they later received the same intervention after a 30-day washout period. One objectively measured questionnaire and two self-reported questionnaires were used to measure clinical competency: the Creighton Competency Evaluation Instrument (CCEI), Clinical Competence Questionnaire (CCQ), and Simulation Effectiveness Tool – Modified Questionnaire (SET-M).
Results
The results revealed significant between-group differences. Specifically, the intervention group showed greater improvement than the control group in both the CCQ (linear contrast [d] = 71.4; 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 53.407, 89.393; P < 0.001) and CCEI total scores (d = 7.17; 95 % CI = 5.837, 8.503; P < 0.001). The SET-M results indicated that 85 % of the participants (n = 51) strongly agreed that they felt more confident about performing a patient handover to the healthcare team after the simulation.
Conclusions
The study findings indicated that both the MPS and single HFS effectively enhanced students' clinical competency. However, MPSs have superior educational outcomes relative to traditional single HFSs.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/352610
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.091

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFung, John Tai Chun-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Siu Ling-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Chun Kit-
dc.contributor.authorLam, Choi Fung-
dc.contributor.authorChau, Yuk Shuen-
dc.contributor.authorLam, Wing Hang-
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Christopher Chi Wai-
dc.contributor.authorLai, Man Hin-
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-18T00:35:03Z-
dc.date.available2024-12-18T00:35:03Z-
dc.date.issued2024-09-01-
dc.identifier.citationNurse Education Today, 2024, v. 140-
dc.identifier.issn0260-6917-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/352610-
dc.description.abstract<p>Background<br>For nurses, clinical competency is paramount in ensuring that patients receive safe, high-quality care. Multi-patient simulation (MPS) in nursing education is gaining attention, and evidence shows its suitability for real-life situations. MPS can be an effective solution for nurses' continuing clinical education.<br>Objectives<br>This project compares the effectiveness of MPS (involving both a standardized patient and a high fidelity simulator) and a single high-fidelity simulation (single HFS; only involving a high fidelity simulator) for enhancing the clinical competency of nursing students.<br>Design<br>A stratified, permuted, block randomized controlled study design was used.<br>Settings and participants.<br>Sixty undergraduate nursing students in years 3, 4, and 5 were selected to participate. Subgroups with each comprising three undergraduate nursing students from different years were formed.<br>Methods<br>The participants were randomized to receive either an MPS (intervention group) or single HFS (control group) for 1 day; they later received the same intervention after a 30-day washout period. One objectively measured questionnaire and two self-reported questionnaires were used to measure clinical competency: the Creighton Competency Evaluation Instrument (CCEI), Clinical Competence Questionnaire (CCQ), and Simulation Effectiveness Tool – Modified Questionnaire (SET-M).<br>Results<br>The results revealed significant between-group differences. Specifically, the intervention group showed greater improvement than the control group in both the CCQ (linear contrast [d] = 71.4; 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 53.407, 89.393; P < 0.001) and CCEI total scores (d = 7.17; 95 % CI = 5.837, 8.503; P < 0.001). The SET-M results indicated that 85 % of the participants (n = 51) strongly agreed that they felt more confident about performing a patient handover to the healthcare team after the simulation.<br>Conclusions<br>The study findings indicated that both the MPS and single HFS effectively enhanced students' clinical competency. However, MPSs have superior educational outcomes relative to traditional single HFSs.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofNurse Education Today-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectClinical competence-
dc.subjectHigh-fidelity simulation-
dc.subjectMulti-patient simulation-
dc.subjectNursing education-
dc.subjectPrioritization competency-
dc.subjectRandomized controlled trial-
dc.titleEnhancing nursing students' clinical competency using a multi-patient simulation learning model: A randomized controlled study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106292-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85197552644-
dc.identifier.volume140-
dc.identifier.eissn1532-2793-
dc.identifier.issnl0260-6917-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats