File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Evidence for lack of transmission by close contact and surface touch in a restaurant outbreak of COVID-19

TitleEvidence for lack of transmission by close contact and surface touch in a restaurant outbreak of COVID-19
Authors
KeywordsAirborne
Close contact
Covid-19
Fomite
Human behavior
Issue Date29-May-2021
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Journal of Infection, 2021, v. 83, n. 2, p. 207-216 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is primarily a respiratory disease that has become a global pandemic. Close contact plays an important role in infection spread, while fomite may also be a possible transmission route. Research during the COVID-19 pandemic has identified long-range airborne transmission as one of the important transmission routes although lack solid evidence. Methods: We examined video data related to a restaurant associated COVID-19 outbreak in Guangzhou. We observed more than 40,000 surface touches and 13,000 episodes of close contacts in the restaurant during the entire lunch duration. These data allowed us to analyse infection risk via both the fomite and close contact routes. Results: There is no significant correlation between the infection risk via both fomite and close contact routes among those who were not family members of the index case. We can thus rule out virus transmission via fomite contact and interpersonal close contact routes in the Guangzhou restaurant outbreak. The absence of a fomite route agrees with the COVID-19 literature. Conclusions: These results provide indirect evidence for the long-range airborne route dominating SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the restaurant. We note that the restaurant was poorly ventilated, allowing for increasing airborne SARS-CoV-2 concentration.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/352774
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 14.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.669
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Nan-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Xuguang-
dc.contributor.authorJia, Wei-
dc.contributor.authorJin, Tianyi-
dc.contributor.authorXiao, Shenglan-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Wenzhao-
dc.contributor.authorHang, Jian-
dc.contributor.authorOu, Cuiyun-
dc.contributor.authorLei, Hao-
dc.contributor.authorQian, Hua-
dc.contributor.authorSu, Boni-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Jiansen-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Dongmei-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Weirong-
dc.contributor.authorXue, Peng-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Jiaping-
dc.contributor.authorWeschler, Louise B.-
dc.contributor.authorXie, Jingchao-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Yuguo-
dc.contributor.authorKang, Min-
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-06T00:35:10Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-06T00:35:10Z-
dc.date.issued2021-05-29-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Infection, 2021, v. 83, n. 2, p. 207-216-
dc.identifier.issn0163-4453-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/352774-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is primarily a respiratory disease that has become a global pandemic. Close contact plays an important role in infection spread, while fomite may also be a possible transmission route. Research during the COVID-19 pandemic has identified long-range airborne transmission as one of the important transmission routes although lack solid evidence. Methods: We examined video data related to a restaurant associated COVID-19 outbreak in Guangzhou. We observed more than 40,000 surface touches and 13,000 episodes of close contacts in the restaurant during the entire lunch duration. These data allowed us to analyse infection risk via both the fomite and close contact routes. Results: There is no significant correlation between the infection risk via both fomite and close contact routes among those who were not family members of the index case. We can thus rule out virus transmission via fomite contact and interpersonal close contact routes in the Guangzhou restaurant outbreak. The absence of a fomite route agrees with the COVID-19 literature. Conclusions: These results provide indirect evidence for the long-range airborne route dominating SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the restaurant. We note that the restaurant was poorly ventilated, allowing for increasing airborne SARS-CoV-2 concentration.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Infection-
dc.subjectAirborne-
dc.subjectClose contact-
dc.subjectCovid-19-
dc.subjectFomite-
dc.subjectHuman behavior-
dc.titleEvidence for lack of transmission by close contact and surface touch in a restaurant outbreak of COVID-19-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jinf.2021.05.030-
dc.identifier.pmid34062182-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85108342850-
dc.identifier.volume83-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage207-
dc.identifier.epage216-
dc.identifier.eissn1532-2742-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000677591900018-
dc.identifier.issnl0163-4453-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats