File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Comparison of the number of oocytes obtained after ovarian stimulation between Chinese and Caucasian women undergoing in vitro fertilization using a standardized stimulation regime

TitleComparison of the number of oocytes obtained after ovarian stimulation between Chinese and Caucasian women undergoing in vitro fertilization using a standardized stimulation regime
Authors
Keywordscorifollitropin alfa
ethnicity
in vitro fertilization
infertility
ovarian response
Issue Date2021
Citation
Journal of Ovarian Research, 2021, v. 14, n. 1, article no. 175 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: In vitro fertilization (IVF) is a well-established method to treat various causes of infertility. Some previous retrospective studies suggested a lower ovarian response in Asian women compared to Caucasian women. However, the ovarian stimulation regimens were not standardized, potentially confounding the findings. The objective of this study is to compare the number of oocytes obtained after ovarian stimulation between Chinese and Caucasian women undergoing IVF using a standardized stimulation regimen. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study conducted in two tertiary IVF units in Hong Kong, China and Sydney, Australia from October 2016 to August 2019. A total of 192 women aged 18–42 years with a body weight > 60 kg underwent IVF with a standard ovarian stimulation regimen of 150 micrograms corifollitropin alfa (Elonva®) followed by 200 IU follitropin beta (Puregon®) per day. The number of oocytes retrieved in Chinese women treated in the Hong Kong center was compared to that of Caucasian women treated in the Australian center. Results: Serum AMH levels were similar between the two groups. Although women in the Chinese cohort were older and had a higher body mass index (BMI), longer duration of infertility and lower antral follicle count (AFC) than those in the Caucasian cohort in this study, no differences in the number of oocytes retrieved [11 (8–17) vs. 11 (6–17), p=0.29], total dosage and duration of stimulation and number of follicles aspirated were noted between the two ethnic cohorts. The peak estradiol level was greater in Chinese women than in Caucasian women. After controlling for age, BMI and AFC, ethnicity was a significant independent determinant of the number of oocytes obtained. Conclusions: Chinese women had a higher number of oocytes after ovarian stimulation using a standardized stimulation regimen compared with Caucasian women undergoing IVF after controlling for age, BMI, AFC and AMH despite presenting later after a longer duration of infertility. Trial registration number: NCT02748278
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/353037
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKo, Jennifer K.Y.-
dc.contributor.authorKan, Andrew-
dc.contributor.authorLeung, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Vivian C.Y.-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Raymond H.W.-
dc.contributor.authorLedger, William-
dc.contributor.authorNg, Ernest H.Y.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-13T03:01:44Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-13T03:01:44Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Ovarian Research, 2021, v. 14, n. 1, article no. 175-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/353037-
dc.description.abstractBackground: In vitro fertilization (IVF) is a well-established method to treat various causes of infertility. Some previous retrospective studies suggested a lower ovarian response in Asian women compared to Caucasian women. However, the ovarian stimulation regimens were not standardized, potentially confounding the findings. The objective of this study is to compare the number of oocytes obtained after ovarian stimulation between Chinese and Caucasian women undergoing IVF using a standardized stimulation regimen. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study conducted in two tertiary IVF units in Hong Kong, China and Sydney, Australia from October 2016 to August 2019. A total of 192 women aged 18–42 years with a body weight > 60 kg underwent IVF with a standard ovarian stimulation regimen of 150 micrograms corifollitropin alfa (Elonva®) followed by 200 IU follitropin beta (Puregon®) per day. The number of oocytes retrieved in Chinese women treated in the Hong Kong center was compared to that of Caucasian women treated in the Australian center. Results: Serum AMH levels were similar between the two groups. Although women in the Chinese cohort were older and had a higher body mass index (BMI), longer duration of infertility and lower antral follicle count (AFC) than those in the Caucasian cohort in this study, no differences in the number of oocytes retrieved [11 (8–17) vs. 11 (6–17), p=0.29], total dosage and duration of stimulation and number of follicles aspirated were noted between the two ethnic cohorts. The peak estradiol level was greater in Chinese women than in Caucasian women. After controlling for age, BMI and AFC, ethnicity was a significant independent determinant of the number of oocytes obtained. Conclusions: Chinese women had a higher number of oocytes after ovarian stimulation using a standardized stimulation regimen compared with Caucasian women undergoing IVF after controlling for age, BMI, AFC and AMH despite presenting later after a longer duration of infertility. Trial registration number: NCT02748278-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Ovarian Research-
dc.subjectcorifollitropin alfa-
dc.subjectethnicity-
dc.subjectin vitro fertilization-
dc.subjectinfertility-
dc.subjectovarian response-
dc.titleComparison of the number of oocytes obtained after ovarian stimulation between Chinese and Caucasian women undergoing in vitro fertilization using a standardized stimulation regime-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13048-021-00928-4-
dc.identifier.pmid34895264-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85121362815-
dc.identifier.volume14-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 175-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 175-
dc.identifier.eissn1757-2215-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000729233800001-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats