File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Effect of hospital case volume on clinical outcomes of patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a territory-wide longitudinal observational study

TitleEffect of hospital case volume on clinical outcomes of patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a territory-wide longitudinal observational study
Authors
Keywordscase volume
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)
intensive care unit (ICU)
length of stay (LOS)
mortality
Issue Date2022
Citation
Journal of Thoracic Disease, 2022, v. 14, n. 6, p. 1802-1814 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: The utilization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has increased rapidly around the world. Being an overall low-volume high-cost form of therapy, the effectiveness of having care delivered in segregated units across a geographical locality is debatable. Methods: All adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cases admitted to public hospitals in Hong Kong between 2010 and 2019 were included. “High-volume” centers were defined as those with >20 extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cases in the respective calendar year, while “low-volume” centers were those with ≤20. Clinical outcomes of patients who received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation care in high-volume centers were compared with those in low-volume centers. Results: A total of 911 patients received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation—297 (32.6%) veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, 450 (49.4%) veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and 164 (18.0%) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The overall hospital mortality was 456 (50.1%). The annual number of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cases in high- and low-volume centers were 29 and 11, respectively. Management in a high-volume center was not significantly associated with hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61–1.21, P=0.38), or with intensive care unit mortality (adjusted OR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.54–1.06, P=0.10) compared with a low-volume center. Over the 10-year period, the overall observed mortality was similar to the Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation IV-predicted mortality, with no significant difference in the standardized mortality ratios between high- and low-volume centers (P=0.46). Conclusions: In a territory-wide observational study, we observed that case volumes in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation centers were not associated with hospital mortality. Maintaining standards of care in low-volume centers is important and improves preparedness for surges in demand.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/353049
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.651

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYeung, Pui Ning Pauline-
dc.contributor.authorIp, April-
dc.contributor.authorFang, Shu-
dc.contributor.authorLin, Jeremy Chang Rang-
dc.contributor.authorLing, Lowell-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Kai Man-
dc.contributor.authorLeung, Kit Hung Anne-
dc.contributor.authorChan, King Chung Kenny-
dc.contributor.authorSo, Dominic-
dc.contributor.authorShum, Hoi Ping-
dc.contributor.authorNgai, Chun Wai-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Wai Ming-
dc.contributor.authorSin, Wai Ching-
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-13T03:01:49Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-13T03:01:49Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Thoracic Disease, 2022, v. 14, n. 6, p. 1802-1814-
dc.identifier.issn2072-1439-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/353049-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The utilization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has increased rapidly around the world. Being an overall low-volume high-cost form of therapy, the effectiveness of having care delivered in segregated units across a geographical locality is debatable. Methods: All adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cases admitted to public hospitals in Hong Kong between 2010 and 2019 were included. “High-volume” centers were defined as those with >20 extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cases in the respective calendar year, while “low-volume” centers were those with ≤20. Clinical outcomes of patients who received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation care in high-volume centers were compared with those in low-volume centers. Results: A total of 911 patients received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation—297 (32.6%) veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, 450 (49.4%) veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and 164 (18.0%) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The overall hospital mortality was 456 (50.1%). The annual number of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cases in high- and low-volume centers were 29 and 11, respectively. Management in a high-volume center was not significantly associated with hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61–1.21, P=0.38), or with intensive care unit mortality (adjusted OR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.54–1.06, P=0.10) compared with a low-volume center. Over the 10-year period, the overall observed mortality was similar to the Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation IV-predicted mortality, with no significant difference in the standardized mortality ratios between high- and low-volume centers (P=0.46). Conclusions: In a territory-wide observational study, we observed that case volumes in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation centers were not associated with hospital mortality. Maintaining standards of care in low-volume centers is important and improves preparedness for surges in demand.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Thoracic Disease-
dc.subjectcase volume-
dc.subjectExtracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-
dc.subjectintensive care unit (ICU)-
dc.subjectlength of stay (LOS)-
dc.subjectmortality-
dc.titleEffect of hospital case volume on clinical outcomes of patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a territory-wide longitudinal observational study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.21037/jtd-21-1512-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85133141690-
dc.identifier.volume14-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.spage1802-
dc.identifier.epage1814-
dc.identifier.eissn2077-6624-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats