File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Pre-treatment subjective sleep quality as a predictive biomarker of tDCS effects in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease patients: Secondary analysis of a randomised clinical trial

TitlePre-treatment subjective sleep quality as a predictive biomarker of tDCS effects in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease patients: Secondary analysis of a randomised clinical trial
Authors
Issue Date28-Jan-2025
PublisherPublic Library of Science
Citation
PLoS ONE, 2025, v. 20 How to Cite?
Abstract

Background

Despite transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has demonstrated encouraging potential for modulating the circadian rhythm, little is known about how well and sustainably tDCS might improve the subjective sleep quality in older adults. This study sought to determine how tDCS affected sleep quality and cognition, as well as how well pre-treatment sleep quality predicted tDCS effects on domain-specific cognitive functions in patients with mild neurocognitive disorder due to Alzheimer’s disease (NCD-AD).

Methods

This clinical trial aimed to compare the effectiveness of tDCS and cognitive training in mild NCD-AD patients (n =  201). Over the course of four weeks, patients were randomized to receive either tDCS plus working memory training, or sham tDCS plus working memory training, or tDCS plus controlled cognitive training. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) was used to measured subjective sleep quality. The Alzheimer’s disease assessment scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) was used to evaluate domain-specific cognitive functions.

Results

Recurrent tDCS treatments enhanced subjective sleep quality and cognition considerably. The poor sleepers (i.e., PSQI >  5) who received tDCS treatment had more cognitive benefits (p =  0.031, Cohen’s d =  0.605) and sleep improvements (p <  0.001, Cohen’s d =  1.209) in comparison to cognitive training. Pre-treatment subjective sleep quality was linked to tDCS-induced improvement in memory function.

Conclusion

During the course of two months, repeated tDCS could considerably enhance subjective sleep quality. For the cognitive benefits of the treatments, the status of pre-treatment subjective sleep quality is crucial. More thorough research is necessary to explore an efficient approach to managing comorbidities for preclinical AD patients.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/354051
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.9
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.839
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLu, Hanna-
dc.contributor.authorNi, Xi-
dc.contributor.authorMan, Chan Sandra Sau-
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Calvin Pak Wing-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Waichi-
dc.contributor.authorLam, Linda Chiu Wa-
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-06T00:35:51Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-06T00:35:51Z-
dc.date.issued2025-01-28-
dc.identifier.citationPLoS ONE, 2025, v. 20-
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/354051-
dc.description.abstract<h3>Background<br></h3><p>Despite transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has demonstrated encouraging potential for modulating the circadian rhythm, little is known about how well and sustainably tDCS might improve the subjective sleep quality in older adults. This study sought to determine how tDCS affected sleep quality and cognition, as well as how well pre-treatment sleep quality predicted tDCS effects on domain-specific cognitive functions in patients with mild neurocognitive disorder due to Alzheimer’s disease (NCD-AD).<br></p><h3>Methods<br></h3><p>This clinical trial aimed to compare the effectiveness of tDCS and cognitive training in mild NCD-AD patients (n =  201). Over the course of four weeks, patients were randomized to receive either tDCS plus working memory training, or sham tDCS plus working memory training, or tDCS plus controlled cognitive training. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) was used to measured subjective sleep quality. The Alzheimer’s disease assessment scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) was used to evaluate domain-specific cognitive functions.<br></p><h3>Results<br></h3><p>Recurrent tDCS treatments enhanced subjective sleep quality and cognition considerably. The poor sleepers (i.e., PSQI >  5) who received tDCS treatment had more cognitive benefits (<em>p</em> =  0.031, Cohen’s <em>d</em> =  0.605) and sleep improvements (<em>p</em> <  0.001, Cohen’s <em>d</em> =  1.209) in comparison to cognitive training. Pre-treatment subjective sleep quality was linked to tDCS-induced improvement in memory function.<br></p><h3>Conclusion<br></h3><p>During the course of two months, repeated tDCS could considerably enhance subjective sleep quality. For the cognitive benefits of the treatments, the status of pre-treatment subjective sleep quality is crucial. More thorough research is necessary to explore an efficient approach to managing comorbidities for preclinical AD patients.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science-
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS ONE-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titlePre-treatment subjective sleep quality as a predictive biomarker of tDCS effects in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease patients: Secondary analysis of a randomised clinical trial-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0317700-
dc.identifier.volume20-
dc.identifier.eissn1932-6203-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001409043700048-
dc.identifier.issnl1932-6203-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats