File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Numerical analysis and wave tank validation on the optimal design of a two-body wave energy converter

TitleNumerical analysis and wave tank validation on the optimal design of a two-body wave energy converter
Authors
KeywordsTime domain and frequency domain modelling
Two-body point absorber
Wave energy converter
Wave tank test
Issue Date2020
Citation
Renewable Energy, 2020, v. 145, p. 632-641 How to Cite?
AbstractTo improve the performance of a ‘point absorber’ type wave energy converter (WEC), an additional submerged body can be deployed. The submerged body can be used to increase the equivalent excitation force on the WEC, as well as provide resonance tuning. This paper presents numerical analysis and experimental validation of a two-body point absorber type WEC using a mechanical motion rectifier (MMR) based power takeoff. The two-body point absorber consists of a floating buoy connected to a neutrally buoyant submerged body via the power-takeoff. The mechanical motion rectifier and a ball screw translate the relative heave motion of the two bodies into unidirectional rotation, which in turn spins a generator. Frequency domain analysis suggests there is an optimal submerged body mass for maximum WEC power absorption. Regular wave simulations in the time domain are compared to the results obtained in the frequency domain. While the time domain and frequency domain results predict the same optimal mass ratio, time domain analysis provides a more complex and accurate power result. To validate the time domain model, experimental wave tank testing is conducted using a 1:30 scale model WEC. The experiment shows the two-body WEC can produce twice the amount of power as the single-body WEC with same floating buoy and can be further increased by PTO design and power electronics optimization. Wave tank testing also shows the two-body WEC has a capture width ratio up to 58% at 59 kW/m and 51% at 36 kW/m.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/354129
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 9.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.923
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Dillon-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Xiaofan-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Chien An-
dc.contributor.authorThiagarajan, Krish-
dc.contributor.authorNgo, Khai-
dc.contributor.authorParker, Robert-
dc.contributor.authorZuo, Lei-
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-07T08:46:39Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-07T08:46:39Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationRenewable Energy, 2020, v. 145, p. 632-641-
dc.identifier.issn0960-1481-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/354129-
dc.description.abstractTo improve the performance of a ‘point absorber’ type wave energy converter (WEC), an additional submerged body can be deployed. The submerged body can be used to increase the equivalent excitation force on the WEC, as well as provide resonance tuning. This paper presents numerical analysis and experimental validation of a two-body point absorber type WEC using a mechanical motion rectifier (MMR) based power takeoff. The two-body point absorber consists of a floating buoy connected to a neutrally buoyant submerged body via the power-takeoff. The mechanical motion rectifier and a ball screw translate the relative heave motion of the two bodies into unidirectional rotation, which in turn spins a generator. Frequency domain analysis suggests there is an optimal submerged body mass for maximum WEC power absorption. Regular wave simulations in the time domain are compared to the results obtained in the frequency domain. While the time domain and frequency domain results predict the same optimal mass ratio, time domain analysis provides a more complex and accurate power result. To validate the time domain model, experimental wave tank testing is conducted using a 1:30 scale model WEC. The experiment shows the two-body WEC can produce twice the amount of power as the single-body WEC with same floating buoy and can be further increased by PTO design and power electronics optimization. Wave tank testing also shows the two-body WEC has a capture width ratio up to 58% at 59 kW/m and 51% at 36 kW/m.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofRenewable Energy-
dc.subjectTime domain and frequency domain modelling-
dc.subjectTwo-body point absorber-
dc.subjectWave energy converter-
dc.subjectWave tank test-
dc.titleNumerical analysis and wave tank validation on the optimal design of a two-body wave energy converter-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.109-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85067573453-
dc.identifier.volume145-
dc.identifier.spage632-
dc.identifier.epage641-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-0682-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000494885700059-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats