File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Comparative accuracy of cone-beam CT and conventional multislice computed tomography for real-time navigation in zygomatic implant surgery

TitleComparative accuracy of cone-beam CT and conventional multislice computed tomography for real-time navigation in zygomatic implant surgery
Authors
Keywordsaccuracy
computer-assisted surgery
edentulous maxillae; real-time navigation surgery
zygomatic implants
Issue Date2020
Citation
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 2020, v. 22, n. 6, p. 747-755 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and conventional multislice CT (MSCT) are both used in zygomatic implant navigation surgery but the superiority of one technique versus the other remains unclear. Purpose: This study compared the accuracy of CBCT and MSCT in zygomatic implant navigation surgery by calculating the deviations of implants. Material and methods: Patients with severely atrophic maxillae were classified into two groups according to the use of CBCT- or MSCT-guided navigation system. The entry and apical distance deviation, and the angle deviation of zygomatic implants were measured on fused operation images. A linear effect model was used for analysis, with statistical significance set at P <.05. Results: A total of 72 zygomatic implants were inserted as planned in 23 patients. The comparison of deviations in CBCT and MSCT groups showed a mean (± SD) entry deviation of 1.69 ± 0.59 mm vs 2.04 ± 0.78 mm (P =.146), apical deviation of 2 ± 0.68 mm vs 2.55 ± 0.85 (P <.001), and angle deviation of 2.32 ± 1.02° vs 3.23 ± 1.21° (P =.038). Conclusion: Real-time zygomatic implant navigation surgery with CBCT may result in higher values for accuracy than MSCT.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/354166
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.7
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.302
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTao, Baoxin-
dc.contributor.authorShen, Yihan-
dc.contributor.authorSun, Yuanyuan-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Wei-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Feng-
dc.contributor.authorWu, Yiqun-
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-07T08:46:54Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-07T08:46:54Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 2020, v. 22, n. 6, p. 747-755-
dc.identifier.issn1523-0899-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/354166-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and conventional multislice CT (MSCT) are both used in zygomatic implant navigation surgery but the superiority of one technique versus the other remains unclear. Purpose: This study compared the accuracy of CBCT and MSCT in zygomatic implant navigation surgery by calculating the deviations of implants. Material and methods: Patients with severely atrophic maxillae were classified into two groups according to the use of CBCT- or MSCT-guided navigation system. The entry and apical distance deviation, and the angle deviation of zygomatic implants were measured on fused operation images. A linear effect model was used for analysis, with statistical significance set at P <.05. Results: A total of 72 zygomatic implants were inserted as planned in 23 patients. The comparison of deviations in CBCT and MSCT groups showed a mean (± SD) entry deviation of 1.69 ± 0.59 mm vs 2.04 ± 0.78 mm (P =.146), apical deviation of 2 ± 0.68 mm vs 2.55 ± 0.85 (P <.001), and angle deviation of 2.32 ± 1.02° vs 3.23 ± 1.21° (P =.038). Conclusion: Real-time zygomatic implant navigation surgery with CBCT may result in higher values for accuracy than MSCT.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research-
dc.subjectaccuracy-
dc.subjectcomputer-assisted surgery-
dc.subjectedentulous maxillae; real-time navigation surgery-
dc.subjectzygomatic implants-
dc.titleComparative accuracy of cone-beam CT and conventional multislice computed tomography for real-time navigation in zygomatic implant surgery-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cid.12958-
dc.identifier.pmid33112508-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85094156810-
dc.identifier.volume22-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.spage747-
dc.identifier.epage755-
dc.identifier.eissn1708-8208-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000587011300001-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats