File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2022.103783
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85126715851
- PMID: 35500986
- WOS: WOS:000788873700006
- Find via

Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Accuracy evaluation of 3D-printed noninvasive adhesive marker for dynamic navigation implant surgery in a maxillary edentulous model: An in vitro study
| Title | Accuracy evaluation of 3D-printed noninvasive adhesive marker for dynamic navigation implant surgery in a maxillary edentulous model: An in vitro study |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | 3D printing Accuracy Dental implant Surgical navigation systems |
| Issue Date | 2022 |
| Citation | Medical Engineering and Physics, 2022, v. 103, article no. 103783 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Dynamic computer-aided implant surgery (DCAIS) can improve dental implantation accuracy and reduce surgical risks. In the registration procedure of DCAIS, the type and the number of registration markers significantly impact the accuracy of DCAIS. One problem of DCAIS in clinical application is that only invasive screw markers can be used for implantation in edentulous patients. It could cause additional trauma, scar formation and usually increase patient discomfort. In this experiment, a personalized 3D-printed edentulous maxillary model was used for simulating clinical situations, and a 3D-printed noninvasive adhesive marker (3D-PNAM) was designed to figure out the above problem. In this research, six target screws were implanted into the model's maxillary alveolar ridge as targets for accuracy analysis. This study used target registration error (TRE) as an index to evaluate the accuracy of invasive screw makers and noninvasive adhesive markers. Results showed that 3D-PNAMs had the same accuracy as screw markers, and placing at least six registration markers in the maxilla was needed for good registration accuracy. The registration markers should be further improved and designed according to application areas' clinical needs and anatomical characteristics in future clinical studies. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/354221 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.7 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.458 |
| ISI Accession Number ID |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Lan, Kengliang | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Tao, Baoxin | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Wang, Feng | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Wu, Yiqun | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-07T08:47:15Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-02-07T08:47:15Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Medical Engineering and Physics, 2022, v. 103, article no. 103783 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1350-4533 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/354221 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Dynamic computer-aided implant surgery (DCAIS) can improve dental implantation accuracy and reduce surgical risks. In the registration procedure of DCAIS, the type and the number of registration markers significantly impact the accuracy of DCAIS. One problem of DCAIS in clinical application is that only invasive screw markers can be used for implantation in edentulous patients. It could cause additional trauma, scar formation and usually increase patient discomfort. In this experiment, a personalized 3D-printed edentulous maxillary model was used for simulating clinical situations, and a 3D-printed noninvasive adhesive marker (3D-PNAM) was designed to figure out the above problem. In this research, six target screws were implanted into the model's maxillary alveolar ridge as targets for accuracy analysis. This study used target registration error (TRE) as an index to evaluate the accuracy of invasive screw makers and noninvasive adhesive markers. Results showed that 3D-PNAMs had the same accuracy as screw markers, and placing at least six registration markers in the maxilla was needed for good registration accuracy. The registration markers should be further improved and designed according to application areas' clinical needs and anatomical characteristics in future clinical studies. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Medical Engineering and Physics | - |
| dc.subject | 3D printing | - |
| dc.subject | Accuracy | - |
| dc.subject | Dental implant | - |
| dc.subject | Surgical navigation systems | - |
| dc.title | Accuracy evaluation of 3D-printed noninvasive adhesive marker for dynamic navigation implant surgery in a maxillary edentulous model: An in vitro study | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.medengphy.2022.103783 | - |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 35500986 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85126715851 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 103 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | article no. 103783 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | article no. 103783 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1873-4030 | - |
| dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000788873700006 | - |
