Accuracy of immediate dental implant placement with task-autonomous robotic system and navigation system: An in vitro study

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of dental implant placement in a single tooth gap, including the postextraction site and healed site, using a task-autonomous robotic system and a dynamic navigation system. Materials and Methods: Forty partially edentulous models requiring both immediate and conventional implant placement were randomly divided into a robotic system group and a navigation system group. The coronal, apical, and angular deviations of the implants were measured and assessed between the groups. Results: The deviations in immediate implant placement were compared between the robotic system and dynamic navigation system groups, showing a mean (±SD) coronal deviation of 0.86 ± 0.36 versus 0.70 ± 0.21 mm (p =.101), a mean apical deviation of 0.77 ± 0.34 versus 0.95 ± 0.38 mm (p =.127), and a mean angular deviation of 1.94 ± 0.66° versus 3.44 ± 1.38° (p <.001). At the healed site, significantly smaller coronal deviation (0.46 ± 0.29 vs. 0.70 ± 0.30 mm, p =.005), apical deviation (0.56 ± 0.30 vs. 0.85 ± 0.25 mm, p <.001), and angular deviation (1.36 ± 0.54 vs. 1.80 ± 0.70 mm, p =.034) were found in the robotic system group than in the dynamic navigation group. Conclusions: The position in both immediate and conventional implant placement was more precise with the task-autonomous robotic system than with the dynamic navigation system. Its performance in actual clinical applications should be confirmed in further trials.