File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/clr.14221
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85178171408
- WOS: WOS:001111062700001
- Find via

Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Deep learning-based automatic segmentation of bone graft material after maxillary sinus augmentation
| Title | Deep learning-based automatic segmentation of bone graft material after maxillary sinus augmentation |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | artificial intelligence deep learning digital dentistry neural networks sinus augmentation |
| Issue Date | 2024 |
| Citation | Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2024, v. 35, n. 8, p. 964-972 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Objectives: To investigate the accuracy and reliability of deep learning in automatic graft material segmentation after maxillary sinus augmentation (SA) from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Materials and Methods: One hundred paired CBCT scans (a preoperative scan and a postoperative scan) were collected and randomly allocated to training (n = 82) and testing (n = 18) subsets. The ground truths of graft materials were labeled by three observers together (two experienced surgeons and a computer engineer). A deep learning model including a 3D V-Net and a 3D Attention V-Net was developed. The overall performance of the model was assessed through the testing data set. The comparative accuracy and inference time consumption of the model-driven and manual segmentation (by two surgeons with 3 years of experience in dental implant surgery) were conducted on 10 CBCT scans from the test samples. Results: The deep learning model had a Dice coefficient (Dice) of 90.36 ± 2.53%, a 95% Hausdorff distance (HD) of 1.59 ± 0.82 mm, and an average surface distance (ASD) of 0.38 ± 0.11 mm. The proposed model only needed 7.2 s, while the surgeon took 19.15 min on average to complete a segmentation task. The overall performances of the model were significantly superior to those of surgeons. Conclusions: The proposed deep learning model yielded a more accurate and efficient performance of automatic segmentation of graft material after SA than that of the two surgeons. The proposed model could facilitate a powerful system for volumetric change evaluation, dental implant planning, and digital dentistry. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/354307 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.865 |
| ISI Accession Number ID |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Tao, Baoxin | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Xu, Jiangchang | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Gao, Jie | - |
| dc.contributor.author | He, Shamin | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Jiang, Shuanglin | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Wang, Feng | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Chen, Xiaojun | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Wu, Yiqun | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-07T08:47:48Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-02-07T08:47:48Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2024, v. 35, n. 8, p. 964-972 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0905-7161 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/354307 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Objectives: To investigate the accuracy and reliability of deep learning in automatic graft material segmentation after maxillary sinus augmentation (SA) from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Materials and Methods: One hundred paired CBCT scans (a preoperative scan and a postoperative scan) were collected and randomly allocated to training (n = 82) and testing (n = 18) subsets. The ground truths of graft materials were labeled by three observers together (two experienced surgeons and a computer engineer). A deep learning model including a 3D V-Net and a 3D Attention V-Net was developed. The overall performance of the model was assessed through the testing data set. The comparative accuracy and inference time consumption of the model-driven and manual segmentation (by two surgeons with 3 years of experience in dental implant surgery) were conducted on 10 CBCT scans from the test samples. Results: The deep learning model had a Dice coefficient (Dice) of 90.36 ± 2.53%, a 95% Hausdorff distance (HD) of 1.59 ± 0.82 mm, and an average surface distance (ASD) of 0.38 ± 0.11 mm. The proposed model only needed 7.2 s, while the surgeon took 19.15 min on average to complete a segmentation task. The overall performances of the model were significantly superior to those of surgeons. Conclusions: The proposed deep learning model yielded a more accurate and efficient performance of automatic segmentation of graft material after SA than that of the two surgeons. The proposed model could facilitate a powerful system for volumetric change evaluation, dental implant planning, and digital dentistry. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Clinical Oral Implants Research | - |
| dc.subject | artificial intelligence | - |
| dc.subject | deep learning | - |
| dc.subject | digital dentistry | - |
| dc.subject | neural networks | - |
| dc.subject | sinus augmentation | - |
| dc.title | Deep learning-based automatic segmentation of bone graft material after maxillary sinus augmentation | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/clr.14221 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85178171408 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 35 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 8 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 964 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 972 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1600-0501 | - |
| dc.identifier.isi | WOS:001111062700001 | - |
