File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Book Chapter: New Directions in Judicial Review? Proportionality, Subsidiarity and Impact Assessment in the Tobacco Product Directive Case
| Title | New Directions in Judicial Review? Proportionality, Subsidiarity and Impact Assessment in the Tobacco Product Directive Case |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Issue Date | 1-Jan-2017 |
| Publisher | Lund University Press |
| Abstract | In this essay in honour of Christina Moëll, we focus on one particular recent case: the Philip Morris case delivered in May 2016 where the European Court of Justice (ECJ) rules on the validity of the Tobacco Product Directive case.1 It is a key case on the application of the principle of proportionality but not only since it connects this principle with other constitutional principles putting limits to the regulatory action such as fundamental rights and the principle of subsidiarity. This case constitutes a perfect illustration of ‘administrative constitutionalism’, a doctrine which encapsulates the academic work of Christina Moëll in a nutshell. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/354857 |
| ISBN |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Groussot, X | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Nowag, J | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-03-14T00:35:24Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-03-14T00:35:24Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2017-01-01 | - |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 9789154405725 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/354857 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | In this essay in honour of Christina Moëll, we focus on one particular recent case: the Philip Morris case delivered in May 2016 where the European Court of Justice (ECJ) rules on the validity of the Tobacco Product Directive case.1 It is a key case on the application of the principle of proportionality but not only since it connects this principle with other constitutional principles putting limits to the regulatory action such as fundamental rights and the principle of subsidiarity. This case constitutes a perfect illustration of ‘administrative constitutionalism’, a doctrine which encapsulates the academic work of Christina Moëll in a nutshell. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Lund University Press | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Festskrift till Christina Moell | - |
| dc.title | New Directions in Judicial Review? Proportionality, Subsidiarity and Impact Assessment in the Tobacco Product Directive Case | - |
| dc.type | Book_Chapter | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 83 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 101 | - |