File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101594
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85218240140
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: The application of tissue engineering strategies for uterine regeneration
Title | The application of tissue engineering strategies for uterine regeneration |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Biomaterial Biomolecule Stem Cell Tissue Engineering Uterine Regeneration |
Issue Date | 1-Apr-2025 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Citation | Materials Today Bio, 2025, v. 31 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Uterine injuries, particularly damages to endometrium, are usually associated with abnormal menstruation, recurrent miscarriage, pregnancy complications, and infertility. Tissue engineering using cell-based, biomolecule-based, or biomaterial and scaffold-based strategies has emerged as a novel and promising approach for uterine regeneration. Stem cells, biomolecules, and porous scaffolds used alone or, very often, used in combination as a more effective treatment means have shown great potential in promoting uterine regeneration. The reported preclinical studies have indicated that appropriate tissue engineering strategies could safely and effectively reconstruct not only endometrium but also partial or even the whole uterine structure. However, the progress in the uterine regeneration area is slow in comparison to that of regenerating many other body tissues and hence it still remains a great challenge to apply uterine tissue engineering for clinical applications. In this review, conventional treatments for uterine-related diseases are briefly reviewed and discussed first. Subsequently, tissue engineering strategies (cell-based, biomolecule-based, biomaterial and scaffold-based, or their combinations) for uterine repair in preclinical studies and clinical trials are presented and analyzed. Finally, the challenges and perspectives in uterine regeneration are pointed and discussed. Despite various limitations and obstacles, the tissue engineering approach is viable and holds high promise for uterine regeneration. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/355121 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 8.7 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.518 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chen, Shangsi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yoo, James J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Min | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-03-27T00:35:34Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-03-27T00:35:34Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2025-04-01 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Materials Today Bio, 2025, v. 31 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2590-0064 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/355121 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Uterine injuries, particularly damages to endometrium, are usually associated with abnormal menstruation, recurrent miscarriage, pregnancy complications, and infertility. Tissue engineering using cell-based, biomolecule-based, or biomaterial and scaffold-based strategies has emerged as a novel and promising approach for uterine regeneration. Stem cells, biomolecules, and porous scaffolds used alone or, very often, used in combination as a more effective treatment means have shown great potential in promoting uterine regeneration. The reported preclinical studies have indicated that appropriate tissue engineering strategies could safely and effectively reconstruct not only endometrium but also partial or even the whole uterine structure. However, the progress in the uterine regeneration area is slow in comparison to that of regenerating many other body tissues and hence it still remains a great challenge to apply uterine tissue engineering for clinical applications. In this review, conventional treatments for uterine-related diseases are briefly reviewed and discussed first. Subsequently, tissue engineering strategies (cell-based, biomolecule-based, biomaterial and scaffold-based, or their combinations) for uterine repair in preclinical studies and clinical trials are presented and analyzed. Finally, the challenges and perspectives in uterine regeneration are pointed and discussed. Despite various limitations and obstacles, the tissue engineering approach is viable and holds high promise for uterine regeneration. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Materials Today Bio | - |
dc.subject | Biomaterial | - |
dc.subject | Biomolecule | - |
dc.subject | Stem Cell | - |
dc.subject | Tissue Engineering | - |
dc.subject | Uterine Regeneration | - |
dc.title | The application of tissue engineering strategies for uterine regeneration | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101594 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85218240140 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 31 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2590-0064 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 2590-0064 | - |