File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Systematic review and meta-analysis of DOACs versus LMWH in Cancer-Associated venous Thrombosis

TitleSystematic review and meta-analysis of DOACs versus LMWH in Cancer-Associated venous Thrombosis
Authors
Issue Date13-Oct-2024
Abstract

Introduction: Cancer-associated venous thrombosis (CAT) is a condition associated with high
mortality rates. However, limited evidence exists regarding the effectiveness and safety of lowmolecular-
weight heparin (LMWH) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for its treatment.
Aims: Using data from multiple clinical and real-world studies, we conducted a systematic review and
meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness and safety of DOACs to LMWH in patients with CAT.
Methods: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases
up to May 31, 2023, for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing
DOACs to LMWH in patients with CAT. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, assessed
the risk of bias, and extracted data. Meta-analyses were performed separately for RCTs and cohort
studies with a specified 6-month follow-up period. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated and pooled using
the random-effects model.
Results: The systematic review included five RCTs and 20 cohort studies. After applying the six-month
follow-up criterion, 17 articles with a total of 22,941 patients were analyzed in the meta-analysis. In
RCTs, DOACs were associated with a lower risk of VTE recurrence (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.49-0.87)
compared to LMWH, with no significant differences in major bleeding (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.85-2.03) and
all-cause mortality (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.84-1.71). Cohort studies showed a lower risk of VTE recurrence
(RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.62-0.80) with DOACs, no significant difference in major bleeding (RR 0.89, 95% CI
0.65-1.22), and a reduced risk of all-cause mortality (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.25-0.85).
Conclusions: The findings from both RCTs and cohort studies indicate that DOACs significantly reduce
the recurrence of VTE in patients with CAT without increasing the risk of major bleeding or all-cause
mortality compared to LMWH. These results suggest that DOACs may provide a superior
anticoagulation effect for CAT compared to LMWH.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/355214

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKANG, Wei-
dc.contributor.authorLau, Rinko Tsz Lam-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Silvia TH-
dc.contributor.authorWei, Yue-
dc.contributor.authorYang, Yu-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Caige-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Kyung Jin-
dc.contributor.authorYan, Vincent KC-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Ian CK-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Esther Wai Yin-
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-29T00:35:21Z-
dc.date.available2025-03-29T00:35:21Z-
dc.date.issued2024-10-13-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/355214-
dc.description.abstract<p>Introduction: Cancer-associated venous thrombosis (CAT) is a condition associated with high<br>mortality rates. However, limited evidence exists regarding the effectiveness and safety of lowmolecular-<br>weight heparin (LMWH) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for its treatment.<br>Aims: Using data from multiple clinical and real-world studies, we conducted a systematic review and<br>meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness and safety of DOACs to LMWH in patients with CAT.<br>Methods: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases<br>up to May 31, 2023, for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing<br>DOACs to LMWH in patients with CAT. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, assessed<br>the risk of bias, and extracted data. Meta-analyses were performed separately for RCTs and cohort<br>studies with a specified 6-month follow-up period. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated and pooled using<br>the random-effects model.<br>Results: The systematic review included five RCTs and 20 cohort studies. After applying the six-month<br>follow-up criterion, 17 articles with a total of 22,941 patients were analyzed in the meta-analysis. In<br>RCTs, DOACs were associated with a lower risk of VTE recurrence (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.49-0.87)<br>compared to LMWH, with no significant differences in major bleeding (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.85-2.03) and<br>all-cause mortality (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.84-1.71). Cohort studies showed a lower risk of VTE recurrence<br>(RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.62-0.80) with DOACs, no significant difference in major bleeding (RR 0.89, 95% CI<br>0.65-1.22), and a reduced risk of all-cause mortality (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.25-0.85).<br>Conclusions: The findings from both RCTs and cohort studies indicate that DOACs significantly reduce<br>the recurrence of VTE in patients with CAT without increasing the risk of major bleeding or all-cause<br>mortality compared to LMWH. These results suggest that DOACs may provide a superior<br>anticoagulation effect for CAT compared to LMWH.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartof16th Asian Conference on Pharmacoepidemiology (12/10/2024-14/10/2024, Tokyo)-
dc.titleSystematic review and meta-analysis of DOACs versus LMWH in Cancer-Associated venous Thrombosis-
dc.typeConference_Paper-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats