Comparison of different topical anesthetic methods for intravitreal injections: a randomized crossover study

Abstract

<h3>Background</h3><p>To evaluate the potential adjunctive effect of pledget anesthetic to topical proparacaine applied in a droplet form in patients undergoing intravitreal injections (IVI).</p><h3>Method</h3><p>This is a single-centre, prospective, randomized, double-blinded crossover study. 60 patients were included. Patients receiving IVI were given topical 0.5% proparacaine drops then randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive 0.5% proparacaine soaked pledget or normal saline soaked pledget as placebo. The patients would later be crossed over to receive the alternative intervention. Pain was assessed with a visual analog scale (VAS) and questionnaire immediately afterwards, 10-minutes and 20-minutes after injection.</p><h3>Result</h3><p>Pain intensity as assessed on the visual analogue scale was lower for the placebo group compared to the pledget group immediately (2.51 cm vs. 2.8 cm), 10-minutes (1.81 cm vs. 2.13 cm) and 20-minutes (1.23 cm vs. 1.65 cm) after injection, however this was not statistically significant (<em>p</em> = 0.48, <em>p</em> = 0.43, <em>p</em> = 0.24 respectively). However, in a subgroup of treatment naïve patients, the addition of pledget anesthesia may lower pain and make IVI more tolerable.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Additional pledget soaked with proparacaine does not enhance anesthesia compared to solely using topical proparacaine for IVI, except in a subset of treatment naïve patients.</p>