File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)

Article: Gut Microbiota Predicts Treatment Response to Empagliflozin Among MASLD Patients Without Diabetes Mellitus

TitleGut Microbiota Predicts Treatment Response to Empagliflozin Among MASLD Patients Without Diabetes Mellitus
Authors
Keywordsgut microbiota
MAFLD
MASH
MASLD
NAFLD
NASH
SGLT2 inhibitors
Issue Date14-Feb-2025
Citation
Liver International, 2025, v. 45, n. 3, p. e70023 How to Cite?
Abstract

Background and Aim

We aimed to investigate whether gut microbiota could predict the treatment response to pharmacological agents among metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) patients without diabetes mellitus (DM), as data are lacking.

Methods

We prospectively followed up non-diabetic MASLD patients who used empagliflozin. Clinical, anthropometric, laboratory assessments and magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) were performed from baseline to week 52 (EOT). Baseline stool samples were collected, and shotgun DNA metagenomic sequencing was performed to profile microbiome. The primary outcome was treatment response to empagliflozin at EOT, defined as MRI-PDFF decline ≥ 30% at EOT from baseline. Linear discriminant analysis [LDA] effect size was used to identify putative bacterial species. Multivariable logistic regression was used to derive adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of outcome with bacterial species by adjusting for clinical factors.

Results

Twenty-two (48.9%) of 45 patients (median age: 56.9 years [IQR: 51.0–63.2]; male: 23 [51.1%]) achieved treatment response at EOT. There was difference in alpha diversity (Shannon index: p < 0.001; Simpson index: p = 0.001) and beta diversity (p = 0.048) in baseline microbiome between treatment response and non-response groups. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (log10LDAscore = 4.27), Lachnospira pectinoschiza (log10LDAscore = 3.99), Anaerostipes hadrus (log10LDAscore = 3.98), Roseburia faecis (log10LDAscore = 3.97), Roseburia inulinivorans (log10LDAscore = 3.58) and Agathobaculum butyriciproducens (log10LDAscore = 2.77) were enriched in the treatment response group. L. pectinoschiza (aOR: 34.1; p = 0.015), A. hadrus (aOR:35.0; p = 0.032) and A. butyriciproducens (aOR:22.3; p = 0.023) independently predicted treatment response but not clinical factors. These three species collectively predicted treatment response with AUROC of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.80–0.99).

Conclusions

Certain gut bacterial species, particularly the combination of A. hadrusL. pectinoschiza and A. butyriciproducens, may predict treatment response to empagliflozin in MAFLD patients without DM.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/355297

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNg, Ho Yu-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Lina-
dc.contributor.authorTan, Jing Tong-
dc.contributor.authorHui, Rex Wan Hin-
dc.contributor.authorYuen, Man Fung-
dc.contributor.authorSeto, Wai Kay-
dc.contributor.authorLeung, Wai K.-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Ka Shing-
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-02T00:35:12Z-
dc.date.available2025-04-02T00:35:12Z-
dc.date.issued2025-02-14-
dc.identifier.citationLiver International, 2025, v. 45, n. 3, p. e70023-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/355297-
dc.description.abstract<h3>Background and Aim</h3><p>We aimed to investigate whether gut microbiota could predict the treatment response to pharmacological agents among metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) patients without diabetes mellitus (DM), as data are lacking.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We prospectively followed up non-diabetic MASLD patients who used empagliflozin. Clinical, anthropometric, laboratory assessments and magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) were performed from baseline to week 52 (EOT). Baseline stool samples were collected, and shotgun DNA metagenomic sequencing was performed to profile microbiome. The primary outcome was treatment response to empagliflozin at EOT, defined as MRI-PDFF decline ≥ 30% at EOT from baseline. Linear discriminant analysis [LDA] effect size was used to identify putative bacterial species. Multivariable logistic regression was used to derive adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of outcome with bacterial species by adjusting for clinical factors.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-two (48.9%) of 45 patients (median age: 56.9 years [IQR: 51.0–63.2]; male: 23 [51.1%]) achieved treatment response at EOT. There was difference in alpha diversity (Shannon index: <em>p</em> < 0.001; Simpson index: <em>p</em> = 0.001) and beta diversity (<em>p</em> = 0.048) in baseline microbiome between treatment response and non-response groups. <em>Faecalibacterium prausnitzii</em> (log<sub>10</sub>LDAscore = 4.27), <em>Lachnospira pectinoschiza</em> (log<sub>10</sub>LDAscore = 3.99), <em>Anaerostipes hadrus</em> (log<sub>10</sub>LDAscore = 3.98), <em>Roseburia faecis</em> (log<sub>10</sub>LDAscore = 3.97), <em>Roseburia inulinivorans</em> (log<sub>10</sub>LDAscore = 3.58) and <em>Agathobaculum butyriciproducens</em> (log<sub>10</sub>LDAscore = 2.77) were enriched in the treatment response group. <em>L. pectinoschiza</em> (aOR: 34.1; <em>p</em> = 0.015), <em>A. hadrus</em> (aOR:35.0; <em>p</em> = 0.032) and <em>A. butyriciproducens</em> (aOR:22.3; <em>p</em> = 0.023) independently predicted treatment response but not clinical factors. These three species collectively predicted treatment response with AUROC of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.80–0.99).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Certain gut bacterial species, particularly the combination of <em>A. hadrus</em>, <em>L. pectinoschiza</em> and <em>A. butyriciproducens,</em> may predict treatment response to empagliflozin in MAFLD patients without DM.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofLiver International-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectgut microbiota-
dc.subjectMAFLD-
dc.subjectMASH-
dc.subjectMASLD-
dc.subjectNAFLD-
dc.subjectNASH-
dc.subjectSGLT2 inhibitors-
dc.titleGut Microbiota Predicts Treatment Response to Empagliflozin Among MASLD Patients Without Diabetes Mellitus-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/liv.70023-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85218839240-
dc.identifier.volume45-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spagee70023-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats