File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Article: A translation and validation study of the traditional Chinese version of RU-SATED scale in Chinese Hong Kong residents

TitleA translation and validation study of the traditional Chinese version of RU-SATED scale in Chinese Hong Kong residents
Authors
Issue Date6-May-2025
Citation
Sleep Health, 2025 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective The Regularity, Satisfaction, Alertness, Timing, Efficiency, and Duration (RU-SATED) version 4.0 is a 6-item tool designed to evaluate sleep health. This study examined the psychometric properties of the traditional Chinese version of RU-SATED (RU-SATED-TC) scale. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted on December 9, 2023 for 4weeks. Participants were recruited via a Facebook page to complete an online questionnaire assessing sleep, mental, and physical health. The RU-SATED-TC uses a 5-point Likert scale, with a total score range from 0-24. The psychometric properties of the RU-SATED-TC, including internal consistency, concurrent validity, 1-week test-retest reliability, and factor analysis, were evaluated. Results A total of 1043 participants (67.3% female, 55.9% aged 18-39) completed the survey. The average RU-SATED-TC scale score was 12.24 (SD = 3.53). Confirmatory factor analyses showed an acceptable model fit (CFI = 0.94, TLI = 0.89, RMSEA = 0.09, and SRMR = 0.04), supporting a two-factor structure of “consistency and effectiveness” and “timing.” “Efficiency” did not load on any factors. The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.608, with corrected item-total correlations ranged from 0.099-0.530. The “timing” item showed the weakest item-total and concurrent correlations with other sleep outcome measures. The 1-week test-retest reliability was good to excellent (ICCs ranging from 0.605-0.843), except for item 4 (efficiency), which had fair reliability (ICC = 0.464). Conclusion The RU-SATED-TC scale appears to be a reliable valid tool for measuring sleep health in Chinese Hong Kong residents. Nevertheless, future research may be needed to refine the “timing” item.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/355749
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.4
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.261

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRuan, J-
dc.contributor.authorYeung, W-
dc.contributor.authorYu, BY-
dc.contributor.authorChung, K-
dc.contributor.authorHo, FY-
dc.contributor.authorLo, HK-
dc.contributor.authorSu, J-
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-08T00:35:10Z-
dc.date.available2025-05-08T00:35:10Z-
dc.date.issued2025-05-06-
dc.identifier.citationSleep Health, 2025-
dc.identifier.issn2352-7218-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/355749-
dc.description.abstractObjective The Regularity, Satisfaction, Alertness, Timing, Efficiency, and Duration (RU-SATED) version 4.0 is a 6-item tool designed to evaluate sleep health. This study examined the psychometric properties of the traditional Chinese version of RU-SATED (RU-SATED-TC) scale. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted on December 9, 2023 for 4weeks. Participants were recruited via a Facebook page to complete an online questionnaire assessing sleep, mental, and physical health. The RU-SATED-TC uses a 5-point Likert scale, with a total score range from 0-24. The psychometric properties of the RU-SATED-TC, including internal consistency, concurrent validity, 1-week test-retest reliability, and factor analysis, were evaluated. Results A total of 1043 participants (67.3% female, 55.9% aged 18-39) completed the survey. The average RU-SATED-TC scale score was 12.24 (SD = 3.53). Confirmatory factor analyses showed an acceptable model fit (CFI = 0.94, TLI = 0.89, RMSEA = 0.09, and SRMR = 0.04), supporting a two-factor structure of “consistency and effectiveness” and “timing.” “Efficiency” did not load on any factors. The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.608, with corrected item-total correlations ranged from 0.099-0.530. The “timing” item showed the weakest item-total and concurrent correlations with other sleep outcome measures. The 1-week test-retest reliability was good to excellent (ICCs ranging from 0.605-0.843), except for item 4 (efficiency), which had fair reliability (ICC = 0.464). Conclusion The RU-SATED-TC scale appears to be a reliable valid tool for measuring sleep health in Chinese Hong Kong residents. Nevertheless, future research may be needed to refine the “timing” item.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofSleep Health-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleA translation and validation study of the traditional Chinese version of RU-SATED scale in Chinese Hong Kong residents-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.issnl2352-7218-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats