File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1186/s12904-025-01786-3
- WOS: WOS:001490870000001
- Find via

Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Web of Science: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the quality of communication questionnaire
| Title | Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the quality of communication questionnaire |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Issue Date | 19-May-2025 |
| Publisher | BioMed Central |
| Citation | BMC Palliative Care, 2025, v. 24 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | BackgroundEffective clinician-patient communication is essential for delivering quality end-of-life care. However, there are no validated measures to assess the quality of end-of-life communication for Chinese patients. MethodsThis study aims to cross-culturally adapt and validate the patient-reported Quality of Communication Questionnaire (QOC) for Chinese speaking patients. The QOC was translated and adapted using a standardized methodology consisting of forward translations, backward translations, expert panel review, and testing with patients. We conducted a cross-sectional study to perform principal component, content validity, internal consistency, convergent and discriminant validity analyses of the 16-item Chinese QOC (C-QOC). Subjects were Chinese-speaking advanced cancer (n = 82) and advanced chronic kidney disease (n = 68) patients attending outpatient clinics in five hospitals or receiving home-based palliative care in Hong Kong. ResultsThe content validity of the C-QOC was established by an expert panel. The C-QOC has a 3-component structure (general communication skills, communication about illness trajectory, and end-of-life care planning subscales) and demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.88; subscales 0.84–0.90). Convergent validity was supported by positive association between C-QOC score and overall clinician communication quality (r = 0.47, p < 0.001) and clinician comfort in discussing dying (r = 0.63, p < 0.001). Discriminant validity was demonstrated by the stronger association between overall clinician communication quality and general communication skills, compared to the other two subscales. ConclusionsThe C-QOC is a valid, reliable, and culturally relevant instrument for evaluating the quality of clinician end-of-life care communication by Chinese patients with advanced cancer and chronic kidney disease. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/356060 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.5 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.907 |
| ISI Accession Number ID |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Yuen, Jacqueline K. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Chan, Helen Y. L. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Chen, Tracy W. T. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Chu, Steven T. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Kwok, Annie O. L. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Leung, Doris Y. P. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Gill, Harinder S. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Tsang, Kwok-wai | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Tse, Doris M. W. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Yap, Desmond Y. H. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Yip, Terence | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Arnold, Robert M. | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-23T00:35:10Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-05-23T00:35:10Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-05-19 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | BMC Palliative Care, 2025, v. 24 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1472-684X | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/356060 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | <h3>Background</h3><p>Effective clinician-patient communication is essential for delivering quality end-of-life care. However, there are no validated measures to assess the quality of end-of-life communication for Chinese patients.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study aims to cross-culturally adapt and validate the patient-reported Quality of Communication Questionnaire (QOC) for Chinese speaking patients. The QOC was translated and adapted using a standardized methodology consisting of forward translations, backward translations, expert panel review, and testing with patients. We conducted a cross-sectional study to perform principal component, content validity, internal consistency, convergent and discriminant validity analyses of the 16-item Chinese QOC (C-QOC). Subjects were Chinese-speaking advanced cancer (<em>n</em> = 82) and advanced chronic kidney disease (<em>n</em> = 68) patients attending outpatient clinics in five hospitals or receiving home-based palliative care in Hong Kong.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The content validity of the C-QOC was established by an expert panel. The C-QOC has a 3-component structure (general communication skills, communication about illness trajectory, and end-of-life care planning subscales) and demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.88; subscales 0.84–0.90). Convergent validity was supported by positive association between C-QOC score and overall clinician communication quality (<em>r</em> = 0.47, <em>p</em> < 0.001) and clinician comfort in discussing dying (<em>r</em> = 0.63, <em>p</em> < 0.001). Discriminant validity was demonstrated by the stronger association between overall clinician communication quality and general communication skills, compared to the other two subscales.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The C-QOC is a valid, reliable, and culturally relevant instrument for evaluating the quality of clinician end-of-life care communication by Chinese patients with advanced cancer and chronic kidney disease.</p> | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | BioMed Central | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | BMC Palliative Care | - |
| dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
| dc.title | Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the quality of communication questionnaire | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.description.nature | published_or_final_version | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s12904-025-01786-3 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 24 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1472-684X | - |
| dc.identifier.isi | WOS:001490870000001 | - |
| dc.identifier.issnl | 1472-684X | - |
