File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Age- and sex-specific criterion validity of the health survey for England physical activity and sedentary behavior assessment questionnaire as compared with accelerometry

TitleAge- and sex-specific criterion validity of the health survey for England physical activity and sedentary behavior assessment questionnaire as compared with accelerometry
Authors
Keywordsaccelerometry
physical activity
questionnaires
sedentary behavior
validation
Issue Date2014
Citation
American Journal of Epidemiology, 2014, v. 179, n. 12, p. 1493-1502 How to Cite?
AbstractThe criterion validity of the 2008 Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Assessment Questionnaire (PASBAQ) was examined in a nationally representative sample of 2,175 persons aged ≥16 years in England using accelerometry. Using accelerometer minutes/day greater than or equal to 200 counts as a criterion, Spearman's correlation coefficient (ρ) for PASBAQ-assessed total activity was 0.30 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.25, 0.35) in women and 0.20 (95% CI: 0.15, 0.26) in men. Correlations between accelerometer counts/minute of wear time and questionnaire-assessed relative energy expenditure (metabolic equivalent-minutes/day) were higher in women (ρ = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.36, 0.46) than in men (ρ = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.26, 0.38). Similar correlations were observed for minutes/day spent in vigorous activity (women: ρ = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.33, 0.46; men: ρ = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.26, 0.36) and moderate-to-vigorous activity (women: ρ = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.36, 0.48; men: ρ = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.32, 0.45). Correlations for time spent being sedentary (<100 counts/minute) were 0.30 (95% CI: 0.24, 0.35) and 0.25 (95% CI: 0.19, 0.30) in women and men, respectively. Sedentary behavior correlations showed no sex difference. The validity of sedentary behavior and total physical activity was higher in older age groups, but validity was higher in younger persons for vigorous-intensity activity. The PASBAQ is a useful and valid instrument for ranking individuals according to levels of physical activity and sedentary behavior. © 2014 The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/356164
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 5.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.837
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorScholes, Shaun-
dc.contributor.authorCoombs, Ngaire-
dc.contributor.authorPedisic, Zeljko-
dc.contributor.authorMindell, Jennifer S.-
dc.contributor.authorBauman, Adrian-
dc.contributor.authorRowlands, Alex V.-
dc.contributor.authorStamatakis, Emmanuel-
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-27T07:21:14Z-
dc.date.available2025-05-27T07:21:14Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2014, v. 179, n. 12, p. 1493-1502-
dc.identifier.issn0002-9262-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/356164-
dc.description.abstractThe criterion validity of the 2008 Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Assessment Questionnaire (PASBAQ) was examined in a nationally representative sample of 2,175 persons aged ≥16 years in England using accelerometry. Using accelerometer minutes/day greater than or equal to 200 counts as a criterion, Spearman's correlation coefficient (ρ) for PASBAQ-assessed total activity was 0.30 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.25, 0.35) in women and 0.20 (95% CI: 0.15, 0.26) in men. Correlations between accelerometer counts/minute of wear time and questionnaire-assessed relative energy expenditure (metabolic equivalent-minutes/day) were higher in women (ρ = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.36, 0.46) than in men (ρ = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.26, 0.38). Similar correlations were observed for minutes/day spent in vigorous activity (women: ρ = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.33, 0.46; men: ρ = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.26, 0.36) and moderate-to-vigorous activity (women: ρ = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.36, 0.48; men: ρ = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.32, 0.45). Correlations for time spent being sedentary (<100 counts/minute) were 0.30 (95% CI: 0.24, 0.35) and 0.25 (95% CI: 0.19, 0.30) in women and men, respectively. Sedentary behavior correlations showed no sex difference. The validity of sedentary behavior and total physical activity was higher in older age groups, but validity was higher in younger persons for vigorous-intensity activity. The PASBAQ is a useful and valid instrument for ranking individuals according to levels of physical activity and sedentary behavior. © 2014 The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Epidemiology-
dc.subjectaccelerometry-
dc.subjectphysical activity-
dc.subjectquestionnaires-
dc.subjectsedentary behavior-
dc.subjectvalidation-
dc.titleAge- and sex-specific criterion validity of the health survey for England physical activity and sedentary behavior assessment questionnaire as compared with accelerometry-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/aje/kwu087-
dc.identifier.pmid24863551-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84902438560-
dc.identifier.volume179-
dc.identifier.issue12-
dc.identifier.spage1493-
dc.identifier.epage1502-
dc.identifier.eissn1476-6256-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000338106100014-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats