File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: High sitting time or obesity: Which came first? Bidirectional association in a longitudinal study of 31,787 Australian adults

TitleHigh sitting time or obesity: Which came first? Bidirectional association in a longitudinal study of 31,787 Australian adults
Authors
Issue Date2014
Citation
Obesity, 2014, v. 22, n. 10, p. 2126-2130 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: Evidence on the direction of the association between sitting time and obesity is limited. The prospective associations between baseline total sitting time and subsequent changes in body mass index (BMI), and baseline BMI and subsequent changes in sitting time were examined. Methods: BMI, from self-reported height and weight, and a single-item measure of sitting time were ascertained at two time points (3.4 ± 0.96 years apart) in a prospective questionnaire-based cohort of 31,787 Australians aged 45-65 years without severe physical limitations. Results: In a fully adjusted model, baseline obesity was associated with increased sitting time among all participants (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.20 [95% CI, 1.11-1.30]; P < 0.001) and in most subgroups. The association was significant among those who were sitting <4 hours/day (aOR = 1.24 [95% CI, 1.07-1.44]; P = 0.004) and 4-8 hours/day at baseline (aOR=1.18 [95% CI, 1.06-1.32]; P = 0.003), but not in the high sitting groups (P = 0.111 and 0.188 for 8-11 and ≥11 sitting hours/day, respectively). Nonsignificant and inconsistent results were observed for the association between baseline sitting time and subsequent change in BMI. Conclusions: Our findings support the hypothesis that obesity may lead to a subsequent increase in total sitting time, but the association in the other direction is unclear.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/356169
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.586
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPedisic, Zeljko-
dc.contributor.authorGrunseit, Anne-
dc.contributor.authorDing-
dc.contributor.authorChau, Josephine Y.-
dc.contributor.authorBanks, Emily-
dc.contributor.authorStamatakis, Emmanuel-
dc.contributor.authorJalaludin, Bin B.-
dc.contributor.authorBauman, Adrian E.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-27T07:21:16Z-
dc.date.available2025-05-27T07:21:16Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationObesity, 2014, v. 22, n. 10, p. 2126-2130-
dc.identifier.issn1930-7381-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/356169-
dc.description.abstractObjective: Evidence on the direction of the association between sitting time and obesity is limited. The prospective associations between baseline total sitting time and subsequent changes in body mass index (BMI), and baseline BMI and subsequent changes in sitting time were examined. Methods: BMI, from self-reported height and weight, and a single-item measure of sitting time were ascertained at two time points (3.4 ± 0.96 years apart) in a prospective questionnaire-based cohort of 31,787 Australians aged 45-65 years without severe physical limitations. Results: In a fully adjusted model, baseline obesity was associated with increased sitting time among all participants (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.20 [95% CI, 1.11-1.30]; P < 0.001) and in most subgroups. The association was significant among those who were sitting <4 hours/day (aOR = 1.24 [95% CI, 1.07-1.44]; P = 0.004) and 4-8 hours/day at baseline (aOR=1.18 [95% CI, 1.06-1.32]; P = 0.003), but not in the high sitting groups (P = 0.111 and 0.188 for 8-11 and ≥11 sitting hours/day, respectively). Nonsignificant and inconsistent results were observed for the association between baseline sitting time and subsequent change in BMI. Conclusions: Our findings support the hypothesis that obesity may lead to a subsequent increase in total sitting time, but the association in the other direction is unclear.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofObesity-
dc.titleHigh sitting time or obesity: Which came first? Bidirectional association in a longitudinal study of 31,787 Australian adults-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/oby.20817-
dc.identifier.pmid24943057-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84907695146-
dc.identifier.volume22-
dc.identifier.issue10-
dc.identifier.spage2126-
dc.identifier.epage2130-
dc.identifier.eissn1930-739X-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000342746800006-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats