File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Comparative analysis of hepatectomy for HCC with PVTT: Insights from a 30-year single-center experience Hepatectomy for HCC with PVTT

TitleComparative analysis of hepatectomy for HCC with PVTT: Insights from a 30-year single-center experience Hepatectomy for HCC with PVTT
Authors
Issue Date12-Mar-2025
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Surgical Oncology, 2025, v. 60 How to Cite?
Abstract

Background and aim: Portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) is frequent in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although hepatectomy is the primary treatment for HCC, no consensus exists on its role in PVTT between Eastern and Western clinicians. This study aims to assess the efficacy of hepatectomy in HCC patients with PVTT by analyzing perioperative outcomes and prognosis. Methods: This retrospective, single-center study reviewed HCC patient data from Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong (1989–2020). Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to match patients with and without PVTT undergoing hepatectomy, comparing perioperative and survival outcomes between groups. Results: Among 3981 HCC patients, 1842 had PVTT and were not operated (not-operated group), while 2139 underwent hepatectomy. Of the operated patients, 156 had PVTT (PVTT group) and 1983 did not (no-PVTT group). Median overall survival (mOS) in the not-operated group was 2.7 months, compared to 13.0 months in the PVTT group. After 1:3 PSM, the no-PVTT group (n = 468) had longer mOS (47.0 vs. 13.0 months, p < 0.001) and disease-free survival (10.6 vs. 4.2 months, p < 0.001). The PVTT group had longer operative times (449 vs. 390 min, p < 0.001), higher complication rates (37.8 % vs. 28.2 %, p = 0.024), and closer surgical margins (0.6 vs. 1.0 cm, p = 0.036), but similar hospital mortality (p = 0.898). mOS for low-AFP (<17400 ng/ml) and highAFP (≥17400 ng/ml) patients was 16.2 vs. 8.2 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Aggressive treatment of PVTT is necessary. For certain PVTT patients, hepatectomy may be potentially effective, with acceptable perioperative safety and seemingly no technical barriers.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/356534
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.651
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYao, Zhicheng-
dc.contributor.authorRen, Yupeng-
dc.contributor.authorCao, Mingbo-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Yuxuan-
dc.contributor.authorSu, Xiaorui-
dc.contributor.authorHu, Ziyi-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Pei-
dc.contributor.authorYuen, Ho Kam-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Tan To-
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-04T00:40:17Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-04T00:40:17Z-
dc.date.issued2025-03-12-
dc.identifier.citationSurgical Oncology, 2025, v. 60-
dc.identifier.issn0960-7404-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/356534-
dc.description.abstract<p>Background and aim: Portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) is frequent in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although hepatectomy is the primary treatment for HCC, no consensus exists on its role in PVTT between Eastern and Western clinicians. This study aims to assess the efficacy of hepatectomy in HCC patients with PVTT by analyzing perioperative outcomes and prognosis. Methods: This retrospective, single-center study reviewed HCC patient data from Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong (1989–2020). Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to match patients with and without PVTT undergoing hepatectomy, comparing perioperative and survival outcomes between groups. Results: Among 3981 HCC patients, 1842 had PVTT and were not operated (not-operated group), while 2139 underwent hepatectomy. Of the operated patients, 156 had PVTT (PVTT group) and 1983 did not (no-PVTT group). Median overall survival (mOS) in the not-operated group was 2.7 months, compared to 13.0 months in the PVTT group. After 1:3 PSM, the no-PVTT group (n = 468) had longer mOS (47.0 vs. 13.0 months, p < 0.001) and disease-free survival (10.6 vs. 4.2 months, p < 0.001). The PVTT group had longer operative times (449 vs. 390 min, p < 0.001), higher complication rates (37.8 % vs. 28.2 %, p = 0.024), and closer surgical margins (0.6 vs. 1.0 cm, p = 0.036), but similar hospital mortality (p = 0.898). mOS for low-AFP (<17400 ng/ml) and highAFP (≥17400 ng/ml) patients was 16.2 vs. 8.2 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Aggressive treatment of PVTT is necessary. For certain PVTT patients, hepatectomy may be potentially effective, with acceptable perioperative safety and seemingly no technical barriers.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofSurgical Oncology-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleComparative analysis of hepatectomy for HCC with PVTT: Insights from a 30-year single-center experience Hepatectomy for HCC with PVTT-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.suronc.2025.102211-
dc.identifier.volume60-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-3320-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001454154400001-
dc.identifier.issnl0960-7404-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats