File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.suronc.2025.102211
- WOS: WOS:001454154400001
- Find via

Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Web of Science: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Comparative analysis of hepatectomy for HCC with PVTT: Insights from a 30-year single-center experience Hepatectomy for HCC with PVTT
| Title | Comparative analysis of hepatectomy for HCC with PVTT: Insights from a 30-year single-center experience Hepatectomy for HCC with PVTT |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Issue Date | 12-Mar-2025 |
| Publisher | Elsevier |
| Citation | Surgical Oncology, 2025, v. 60 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Background and aim: Portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) is frequent in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although hepatectomy is the primary treatment for HCC, no consensus exists on its role in PVTT between Eastern and Western clinicians. This study aims to assess the efficacy of hepatectomy in HCC patients with PVTT by analyzing perioperative outcomes and prognosis. Methods: This retrospective, single-center study reviewed HCC patient data from Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong (1989–2020). Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to match patients with and without PVTT undergoing hepatectomy, comparing perioperative and survival outcomes between groups. Results: Among 3981 HCC patients, 1842 had PVTT and were not operated (not-operated group), while 2139 underwent hepatectomy. Of the operated patients, 156 had PVTT (PVTT group) and 1983 did not (no-PVTT group). Median overall survival (mOS) in the not-operated group was 2.7 months, compared to 13.0 months in the PVTT group. After 1:3 PSM, the no-PVTT group (n = 468) had longer mOS (47.0 vs. 13.0 months, p < 0.001) and disease-free survival (10.6 vs. 4.2 months, p < 0.001). The PVTT group had longer operative times (449 vs. 390 min, p < 0.001), higher complication rates (37.8 % vs. 28.2 %, p = 0.024), and closer surgical margins (0.6 vs. 1.0 cm, p = 0.036), but similar hospital mortality (p = 0.898). mOS for low-AFP (<17400 ng/ml) and highAFP (≥17400 ng/ml) patients was 16.2 vs. 8.2 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Aggressive treatment of PVTT is necessary. For certain PVTT patients, hepatectomy may be potentially effective, with acceptable perioperative safety and seemingly no technical barriers. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/356534 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.3 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.651 |
| ISI Accession Number ID |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Yao, Zhicheng | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Ren, Yupeng | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Cao, Mingbo | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Li, Yuxuan | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Su, Xiaorui | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Hu, Ziyi | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Han, Pei | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Yuen, Ho Kam | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Cheung, Tan To | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-06-04T00:40:17Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-06-04T00:40:17Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-03-12 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Surgical Oncology, 2025, v. 60 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0960-7404 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/356534 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | <p>Background and aim: Portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) is frequent in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although hepatectomy is the primary treatment for HCC, no consensus exists on its role in PVTT between Eastern and Western clinicians. This study aims to assess the efficacy of hepatectomy in HCC patients with PVTT by analyzing perioperative outcomes and prognosis. Methods: This retrospective, single-center study reviewed HCC patient data from Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong (1989–2020). Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to match patients with and without PVTT undergoing hepatectomy, comparing perioperative and survival outcomes between groups. Results: Among 3981 HCC patients, 1842 had PVTT and were not operated (not-operated group), while 2139 underwent hepatectomy. Of the operated patients, 156 had PVTT (PVTT group) and 1983 did not (no-PVTT group). Median overall survival (mOS) in the not-operated group was 2.7 months, compared to 13.0 months in the PVTT group. After 1:3 PSM, the no-PVTT group (n = 468) had longer mOS (47.0 vs. 13.0 months, p < 0.001) and disease-free survival (10.6 vs. 4.2 months, p < 0.001). The PVTT group had longer operative times (449 vs. 390 min, p < 0.001), higher complication rates (37.8 % vs. 28.2 %, p = 0.024), and closer surgical margins (0.6 vs. 1.0 cm, p = 0.036), but similar hospital mortality (p = 0.898). mOS for low-AFP (<17400 ng/ml) and highAFP (≥17400 ng/ml) patients was 16.2 vs. 8.2 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Aggressive treatment of PVTT is necessary. For certain PVTT patients, hepatectomy may be potentially effective, with acceptable perioperative safety and seemingly no technical barriers.</p> | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Surgical Oncology | - |
| dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
| dc.title | Comparative analysis of hepatectomy for HCC with PVTT: Insights from a 30-year single-center experience Hepatectomy for HCC with PVTT | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.suronc.2025.102211 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 60 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1879-3320 | - |
| dc.identifier.isi | WOS:001454154400001 | - |
| dc.identifier.issnl | 0960-7404 | - |
