File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Zoonoses and Animal Culling: The Need for One Health Policy

TitleZoonoses and Animal Culling: The Need for One Health Policy
Authors
Keywordsanthropocentrism
bioethics
Covid-19
ecosystem
monkeypox
One Health
Issue Date1-Sep-2022
PublisherWiley
Citation
The Hastings Center Report, 2022, v. 52, n. 5, p. 6-7 How to Cite?
Abstract

One Health (OH) as a biomedical and social movement calls to reorient public health approaches toward more holistic, nonanthropocentric approaches that do not exclude the interests of animals and ecosystems. OH thus urges reexamination, from both scientific and moral perspectives, of the practice of culling pet, farm, or wild animals in the face of a zoonosis. Pandemics such as Covid and monkeypox highlight the need for more rigorous analysis of the justifications traditionally provided to back these culling practices. Such analyses should then ground reasonable OH policies and legislation that consider the rights of humans, animals, and the environment. Bill S.861, "Advancing Emergency Preparedness through One Health Act of 2021," which was introduced in the U.S. Congress, is a step in the right direction.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/356930
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.667
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLederman, Zohar-
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-23T08:52:31Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-23T08:52:31Z-
dc.date.issued2022-09-01-
dc.identifier.citationThe Hastings Center Report, 2022, v. 52, n. 5, p. 6-7-
dc.identifier.issn0093-0334-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/356930-
dc.description.abstract<p> <span>One Health (OH) as a biomedical and social movement calls to reorient public health approaches toward more holistic, nonanthropocentric approaches that do not exclude the interests of animals and ecosystems. OH thus urges reexamination, from both scientific and moral perspectives, of the practice of culling pet, farm, or wild animals in the face of a zoonosis. Pandemics such as Covid and monkeypox highlight the need for more rigorous analysis of the justifications traditionally provided to back these culling practices. Such analyses should then ground reasonable OH policies and legislation that consider the rights of humans, animals, and the environment. Bill S.861, "Advancing Emergency Preparedness through One Health Act of 2021," which was introduced in the U.S. Congress, is a step in the right direction.</span> <br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley-
dc.relation.ispartofThe Hastings Center Report-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectanthropocentrism-
dc.subjectbioethics-
dc.subjectCovid-19-
dc.subjectecosystem-
dc.subjectmonkeypox-
dc.subjectOne Health-
dc.titleZoonoses and Animal Culling: The Need for One Health Policy-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/hast.1415-
dc.identifier.pmid36226881-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85139794945-
dc.identifier.volume52-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.identifier.spage6-
dc.identifier.epage7-
dc.identifier.eissn1552-146X-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000868299800005-
dc.publisher.placeHOBOKEN-
dc.identifier.issnl0093-0334-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats