File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Introducing One Health to the Ethical Debate About Zoonotic Diseases in Southeast Asia

TitleIntroducing One Health to the Ethical Debate About Zoonotic Diseases in Southeast Asia
Authors
KeywordsOne Health
Pandemic planning
Public health
Zoonotics
Issue Date1-Jul-2015
PublisherWiley
Citation
Bioethics, 2015, v. 29, n. 8, p. 588-596 How to Cite?
Abstract

Pandemic plans recommend phases of response to an emergent infectious disease (EID) outbreak, and are primarily aimed at preventing and mitigating human-to-human transmission. These plans carry presumptive weight and are increasingly being operationalized at the national, regional and international level with the support of the World Health Organization (WHO). The conventional focus of pandemic preparedness for EIDs of zoonotic origin has been on public health and human welfare. However, this focus on human populations has resulted in strategically important disciplinary silos. As the risks of zoonotic diseases have implications that reach across many domains outside traditional public health, including anthropological, environmental, and veterinary fora, a more inclusive ecological perspective is paramount for an effective response to future outbreaks.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/356939
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.7
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.734
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCapps, Benjamin-
dc.contributor.authorBailey, Michele Marie-
dc.contributor.authorBickford, David-
dc.contributor.authorCoker, Richard-
dc.contributor.authorLederman, Zohar-
dc.contributor.authorLover, Andrew-
dc.contributor.authorLysaght, Tamra-
dc.contributor.authorTambyah, Paul-
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-23T08:52:34Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-23T08:52:34Z-
dc.date.issued2015-07-01-
dc.identifier.citationBioethics, 2015, v. 29, n. 8, p. 588-596-
dc.identifier.issn0269-9702-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/356939-
dc.description.abstract<p> <span>Pandemic plans recommend phases of response to an emergent infectious disease (EID) outbreak, and are primarily aimed at preventing and mitigating human-to-human transmission. These plans carry presumptive weight and are increasingly being operationalized at the national, regional and international level with the support of the World Health Organization (WHO). The conventional focus of pandemic preparedness for EIDs of zoonotic origin has been on public health and human welfare. However, this focus on human populations has resulted in strategically important disciplinary silos. As the risks of zoonotic diseases have implications that reach across many domains outside traditional public health, including anthropological, environmental, and veterinary fora, a more inclusive ecological perspective is paramount for an effective response to future outbreaks.</span> <br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley-
dc.relation.ispartofBioethics-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectOne Health-
dc.subjectPandemic planning-
dc.subjectPublic health-
dc.subjectZoonotics-
dc.titleIntroducing One Health to the Ethical Debate About Zoonotic Diseases in Southeast Asia-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/bioe.12145-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84941739061-
dc.identifier.volume29-
dc.identifier.issue8-
dc.identifier.spage588-
dc.identifier.epage596-
dc.identifier.eissn1467-8519-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000360841000009-
dc.identifier.issnl0269-9702-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats