File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.iref.2021.12.018
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85123683458
- WOS: WOS:000748665100002
- Find via

Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Globalization blueprint and households’ fintech debt: Evidence from China’s One Belt One Road initiative
| Title | Globalization blueprint and households’ fintech debt: Evidence from China’s One Belt One Road initiative |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | Peer-to-Peer crowdfunding The Belt Road Initiative |
| Issue Date | 25-Jan-2022 |
| Publisher | Elsevier |
| Citation | International Review of Economics & Finance, 2022, v. 79, p. 38-55 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | How do households’ Fintech borrowings respond to a country’s globalization initiative? It is intriguing to study whether Fintech market participants would form their expectations in the wake of a national strategy and thus affect their contemporaneous Fintech borrowings. In this paper, we investigate this question through China’s One Belt One Road initiative (OBOR) using transaction-level Peer-to-Peer (P2P) loan data. The difference-in-differences estimates, consistent with our theoretical framework, show that borrowers from China’s OBOR node-cities, especially the financially constrained ones, increase their Fintech loans instantaneously after the policy announcement. Such effects are more pronounced for borrowers from the infrastructure-related industries, the state-owned enterprises, and the silk-belt (land-based) node-cities. Our ex-post analysis indicates that the default rate of the borrowers from the OBOR node-cities is significantly lower. Finally, we find borrowers residing in the cities close to the node-cities also increase their Fintech leverages, showing a perceived positive externality of the policy initiative. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/356992 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.093 |
| ISI Accession Number ID |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Yun | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Liu, Yun | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Yifei | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Chen, Xin | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-06-23T08:52:49Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-06-23T08:52:49Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2022-01-25 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | International Review of Economics & Finance, 2022, v. 79, p. 38-55 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1059-0560 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/356992 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | <p>How do households’ <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/economics-econometrics-and-finance/fintech" title="Learn more about Fintech from ScienceDirect's AI-generated Topic Pages">Fintech</a> borrowings respond to a country’s globalization initiative? It is intriguing to study whether Fintech market participants would form their <em>expectations</em> in the wake of a national strategy and thus affect their contemporaneous Fintech borrowings. In this paper, we investigate this question through China’s One Belt One Road initiative (OBOR) using transaction-level Peer-to-Peer (P2P) loan data. The difference-in-differences estimates, consistent with our theoretical framework, show that borrowers from China’s OBOR node-cities, especially the financially constrained ones, increase their Fintech loans instantaneously after the policy announcement. Such effects are more pronounced for borrowers from the infrastructure-related <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/economics-econometrics-and-finance/specific-industry" title="Learn more about industries from ScienceDirect's AI-generated Topic Pages">industries</a>, the state-owned enterprises, and the silk-belt (land-based) node-cities. Our ex-post analysis indicates that the default rate of the borrowers from the OBOR node-cities is significantly lower. Finally, we find borrowers residing in the cities close to the node-cities also increase their Fintech leverages, showing a perceived positive externality of the policy initiative.</p> | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | International Review of Economics & Finance | - |
| dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
| dc.subject | Peer-to-Peer crowdfunding | - |
| dc.subject | The Belt Road Initiative | - |
| dc.title | Globalization blueprint and households’ fintech debt: Evidence from China’s One Belt One Road initiative | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.iref.2021.12.018 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85123683458 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 79 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 38 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 55 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1873-8036 | - |
| dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000748665100002 | - |
| dc.identifier.issnl | 1059-0560 | - |
