File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Paternalism as Punishment

TitlePaternalism as Punishment
Authors
Issue Date21-Sep-2020
PublisherCambridge University Press
Citation
Utilitas, 2020, v. 33, n. 1, p. 35-52 How to Cite?
Abstract

In this article, I argue that even if we hold that at least some paternalistic behaviour is impermissible when directed towards innocent persons, in certain cases, the same behaviour is permissible when directed towards criminal offenders. I also defend the claim that in some cases it is morally preferable to behave paternalistically towards offenders as an alternative to traditional methods of punishment. I propose that the reason paternalistic behaviour is sometimes permissible towards an offender is the same reason that inflicting intentional harm on an offender is permissible – namely, that it is sometimes a morally justified method of punishing an offender for his wrongdoing.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/357154
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.381
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBirks, David-
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-23T08:53:41Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-23T08:53:41Z-
dc.date.issued2020-09-21-
dc.identifier.citationUtilitas, 2020, v. 33, n. 1, p. 35-52-
dc.identifier.issn0953-8208-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/357154-
dc.description.abstract<p>In this article, I argue that even if we hold that at least some paternalistic behaviour is impermissible when directed towards innocent persons, in certain cases, the same behaviour is permissible when directed towards criminal offenders. I also defend the claim that in some cases it is morally preferable to behave paternalistically towards offenders as an alternative to traditional methods of punishment. I propose that the reason paternalistic behaviour is sometimes permissible towards an offender is the same reason that inflicting intentional harm on an offender is permissible – namely, that it is sometimes a morally justified method of punishing an offender for his wrongdoing.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherCambridge University Press-
dc.relation.ispartofUtilitas-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titlePaternalism as Punishment-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0953820820000254-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85094146948-
dc.identifier.volume33-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage35-
dc.identifier.epage52-
dc.identifier.eissn1741-6183-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000838669000003-
dc.identifier.issnl0953-8208-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats