File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1017/S0963180118000269
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85060107749
- WOS: WOS:000457483600010
- Find via

Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Neuroscience and Social Problems: The Case of Neuropunishment
| Title | Neuroscience and Social Problems: The Case of Neuropunishment |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | biomedicine neurointerventions for punishment neuropunishments neuroscience |
| Issue Date | 10-Sep-2018 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| Citation | Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 2018, v. 27, n. 4, p. 628-634 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Neuroscientific interventions are increasingly proposed as solutions for social problems, beyond their application in biomedicine. For example, there is increasing interest, particularly from outside commentators, in harnessing neuroscientific advances as an alternative method of punishing criminal offenders. Such neuropunishments are seen as a potentially more effective, less costly, and more humane alternative to incarceration, with overall better results for offender, communities, and societies. This article considers whether neuroscience as a field should engage more actively with such proposals, and whether more research should be done to explore the use of neurointerventions for punishment. It concludes that neuroscientists and those working at the intersection of neuroscience and the clinic should actively shape these debates. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/357159 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.5 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.462 |
| ISI Accession Number ID |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Buyx, Alena | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Birks, David | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-06-23T08:53:42Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-06-23T08:53:42Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2018-09-10 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 2018, v. 27, n. 4, p. 628-634 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0963-1801 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/357159 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | <p>Neuroscientific interventions are increasingly proposed as solutions for social problems, beyond their application in biomedicine. For example, there is increasing interest, particularly from outside commentators, in harnessing neuroscientific advances as an alternative method of punishing criminal offenders. Such neuropunishments are seen as a potentially more effective, less costly, and more humane alternative to incarceration, with overall better results for offender, communities, and societies. This article considers whether neuroscience as a field should engage more actively with such proposals, and whether more research should be done to explore the use of neurointerventions for punishment. It concludes that neuroscientists and those working at the intersection of neuroscience and the clinic should actively shape these debates.</p> | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Cambridge University Press | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics | - |
| dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
| dc.subject | biomedicine | - |
| dc.subject | neurointerventions for punishment | - |
| dc.subject | neuropunishments | - |
| dc.subject | neuroscience | - |
| dc.title | Neuroscience and Social Problems: The Case of Neuropunishment | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1017/S0963180118000269 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85060107749 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 27 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 4 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 628 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 634 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1469-2147 | - |
| dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000457483600010 | - |
| dc.identifier.issnl | 0963-1801 | - |
