File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Representativeness of the Hong Kong English lexicon

TitleRepresentativeness of the Hong Kong English lexicon
Other TitlesStudying word formation from an end-user perspective
Authors
Issue Date13-May-2024
PublisherCambridge University Press
Citation
English Today: The International Review of the English Language, 2024 How to Cite?
Abstract

In 2016, the Oxford English Dictionary (OED) formally recognized the status of Hong Kong English (HKE) by adding 13 HKE words in its entries (Oxford English Dictionary [OED], n.d.-a). While this codification marks significant progress in the development of a language variety, there have been vigorous discussions within the local community about the legitimacy and representativeness of these selected words as HKE (Xu, 2019). As emphasized by Schneider (2007), acceptability and codification are both important criteria for language development. Therefore, this warrants a bottom-up approach to investigate the extent to which HKE words are accepted by the local community, so as to provide insights on how future HKE words can be better codified.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/357231
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.725
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYeung, Matthew W L-
dc.contributor.authorYau, Alice H Y-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Crystal Y P-
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-23T08:54:09Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-23T08:54:09Z-
dc.date.issued2024-05-13-
dc.identifier.citationEnglish Today: The International Review of the English Language, 2024-
dc.identifier.issn0266-0784-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/357231-
dc.description.abstract<p>In 2016, the Oxford English Dictionary (OED) formally recognized the status of Hong Kong English (HKE) by adding 13 HKE words in its entries (Oxford English Dictionary [OED], n.d.-a). While this codification marks significant progress in the development of a language variety, there have been vigorous discussions within the local community about the legitimacy and representativeness of these selected words as HKE (Xu, 2019). As emphasized by Schneider (2007), acceptability and codification are both important criteria for language development. Therefore, this warrants a bottom-up approach to investigate the extent to which HKE words are accepted by the local community, so as to provide insights on how future HKE words can be better codified.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherCambridge University Press-
dc.relation.ispartofEnglish Today: The International Review of the English Language-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleRepresentativeness of the Hong Kong English lexicon-
dc.title.alternativeStudying word formation from an end-user perspective-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0266078424000026-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85193600289-
dc.identifier.eissn1474-0567-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001220619800001-
dc.identifier.issnl0266-0784-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats