File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Biological aging of different blood cell types

TitleBiological aging of different blood cell types
Authors
KeywordsBiological age
Biological aging
Blood cell subtypes
DNA methylation
Epigenetic clock
Telomere length
Issue Date26-Jul-2024
PublisherSpringer
Citation
GeroScience, 2024 How to Cite?
Abstract

Biological age (BA) captures detrimental age-related changes. The best-known and most-used BA indicators include DNA methylation–based epigenetic clocks and telomere length (TL). The most common biological sample material for epidemiological aging studies, whole blood, is composed of different cell types. We aimed to compare differences in BAs between blood cell types and assessed the BA indicators’ cell type-specific associations with chronological age (CA). An analysis of DNA methylation–based BA indicators, including TL, methylation level at cg16867657 in ELOVL2, as well as the Hannum, Horvath, DNAmPhenoAge, and DunedinPACE epigenetic clocks, was performed on 428 biological samples of 12 blood cell types. BA values were different in the majority of the pairwise comparisons between cell types, as well as in comparison to whole blood (p < 0.05). DNAmPhenoAge showed the largest cell type differences, up to 44.5 years and DNA methylation-based TL showed the lowest differences. T cells generally had the "youngest" BA values, with differences across subsets, whereas monocytes had the "oldest" values. All BA indicators, except DunedinPACE, strongly correlated with CA within a cell type. Some differences such as DNAmPhenoAge-difference between naïve CD4 + T cells and monocytes were constant regardless of the blood donor's CA (range 20–80 years), while for DunedinPACE they were not. In conclusion, DNA methylation–based indicators of BA exhibit cell type–specific characteristics. Our results have implications for understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying epigenetic clocks and underscore the importance of considering cell composition when utilizing them as indicators for the success of aging interventions.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/357258
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 5.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.468
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMarttila, Saara-
dc.contributor.authorRajić, Sonja-
dc.contributor.authorCiantar, Joanna-
dc.contributor.authorMak, Jonathan K L-
dc.contributor.authorJunttila, Ilkka S-
dc.contributor.authorKummola, Laura-
dc.contributor.authorHägg, Sara-
dc.contributor.authorRaitoharju, Emma-
dc.contributor.authorKananen, Laura-
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-23T08:54:23Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-23T08:54:23Z-
dc.date.issued2024-07-26-
dc.identifier.citationGeroScience, 2024-
dc.identifier.issn2509-2715-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/357258-
dc.description.abstract<p>Biological age (BA) captures detrimental age-related changes. The best-known and most-used BA indicators include DNA methylation–based epigenetic clocks and telomere length (TL). The most common biological sample material for epidemiological aging studies, whole blood, is composed of different cell types. We aimed to compare differences in BAs between blood cell types and assessed the BA indicators’ cell type-specific associations with chronological age (CA). An analysis of DNA methylation–based BA indicators, including TL, methylation level at cg16867657 in <em>ELOVL2</em>, as well as the Hannum, Horvath, DNAmPhenoAge, and DunedinPACE epigenetic clocks, was performed on 428 biological samples of 12 blood cell types. BA values were different in the majority of the pairwise comparisons between cell types, as well as in comparison to whole blood (<em>p</em> < 0.05). DNAmPhenoAge showed the largest cell type differences, up to 44.5 years and DNA methylation-based TL showed the lowest differences. T cells generally had the "youngest" BA values, with differences across subsets, whereas monocytes had the "oldest" values. All BA indicators, except DunedinPACE, strongly correlated with CA within a cell type. Some differences such as DNAmPhenoAge-difference between naïve CD4 + T cells and monocytes were constant regardless of the blood donor's CA (range 20–80 years), while for DunedinPACE they were not. In conclusion, DNA methylation–based indicators of BA exhibit cell type–specific characteristics. Our results have implications for understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying epigenetic clocks and underscore the importance of considering cell composition when utilizing them as indicators for the success of aging interventions.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.relation.ispartofGeroScience-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectBiological age-
dc.subjectBiological aging-
dc.subjectBlood cell subtypes-
dc.subjectDNA methylation-
dc.subjectEpigenetic clock-
dc.subjectTelomere length-
dc.titleBiological aging of different blood cell types-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11357-024-01287-w-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85199572746-
dc.identifier.eissn2509-2723-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001278324400001-
dc.identifier.issnl2509-2723-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats