File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Borders of belonging: how Chinese nationalism constructs exclusion in the age of populism

TitleBorders of belonging: how Chinese nationalism constructs exclusion in the age of populism
Authors
Keywordsbelt and road
borders
Chinese media
digital identity
nationalism
populism
Issue Date25-Nov-2024
PublisherFrontiers
Citation
Frontiers in Political Science, 2024, v. 6 How to Cite?
Abstract

This paper investigates how state-led and popular nationalism in China construct borders as tools of exclusion, reinforcing national identity amidst global populist movements. Using the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) as a case study, the analysis examines Global Times articles and corresponding user-generated content to reveal how geopolitical, ideological, and emotional borders are created and maintained through nationalist discourse. State-led nationalism emphasizes cooperation and diplomacy, framing borders to position China as a global leader promoting shared prosperity. In contrast, popular nationalism—expressed through user-generated comments—manifests in a confrontational, exclusionary discourse that delineates China from external adversaries, particularly Western powers. Through a mixed-methods approach—combining word frequency, sentiment, and emotional categorization using the NRC Emotion Lexicon—this study uncovers key differences between the two forms of nationalism. State narratives construct inclusive borders that foster international engagement, aligning with China’s diplomatic ambitions. Meanwhile, popular nationalism reflects heightened emotional intensity, especially through expressions of fear, anger, and opposition, creating rigid borders that emphasize ideological conflict and national pride. The research contributes to the literature on populism and border studies by demonstrating how Chinese nationalism functions as both a state strategy and a grassroots expression, delineating “the people” from “the other.” It highlights the critical role of media—both state-controlled outlets and user-generated platforms—in constructing and reinforcing these boundaries. As populism continues to shape political discourse globally, the study offers valuable insights into how nationalism in non-Western contexts mirrors broader populist strategies of identity formation through the construction of symbolic and emotional borders. 


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/357374
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.697
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLeung, Chun Kai-
dc.contributor.authorKo, Jeremy-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Anthony-
dc.contributor.authorPun, Boris Lok-fai-
dc.contributor.authorMing, Wai-Kit-
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-23T08:54:57Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-23T08:54:57Z-
dc.date.issued2024-11-25-
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Political Science, 2024, v. 6-
dc.identifier.issn2673-3145-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/357374-
dc.description.abstract<p>This paper investigates how state-led and popular nationalism in China construct borders as tools of exclusion, reinforcing national identity amidst global populist movements. Using the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) as a case study, the analysis examines Global Times articles and corresponding user-generated content to reveal how geopolitical, ideological, and emotional borders are created and maintained through nationalist discourse. State-led nationalism emphasizes cooperation and diplomacy, framing borders to position China as a global leader promoting shared prosperity. In contrast, popular nationalism—expressed through user-generated comments—manifests in a confrontational, exclusionary discourse that delineates China from external adversaries, particularly Western powers. Through a mixed-methods approach—combining word frequency, sentiment, and emotional categorization using the NRC Emotion Lexicon—this study uncovers key differences between the two forms of nationalism. State narratives construct inclusive borders that foster international engagement, aligning with China’s diplomatic ambitions. Meanwhile, popular nationalism reflects heightened emotional intensity, especially through expressions of fear, anger, and opposition, creating rigid borders that emphasize ideological conflict and national pride. The research contributes to the literature on populism and border studies by demonstrating how Chinese nationalism functions as both a state strategy and a grassroots expression, delineating “the people” from “the other.” It highlights the critical role of media—both state-controlled outlets and user-generated platforms—in constructing and reinforcing these boundaries. As populism continues to shape political discourse globally, the study offers valuable insights into how nationalism in non-Western contexts mirrors broader populist strategies of identity formation through the construction of symbolic and emotional borders. <br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherFrontiers-
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Political Science-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectbelt and road-
dc.subjectborders-
dc.subjectChinese media-
dc.subjectdigital identity-
dc.subjectnationalism-
dc.subjectpopulism-
dc.titleBorders of belonging: how Chinese nationalism constructs exclusion in the age of populism -
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpos.2024.1501363-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85212073278-
dc.identifier.volume6-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001372183300001-
dc.identifier.issnl2673-3145-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats