File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: From Public Health to Political Repression: COVID-19 Lockdown Measure in Hong Kong's Opposition Districts

TitleFrom Public Health to Political Repression: COVID-19 Lockdown Measure in Hong Kong's Opposition Districts
Authors
KeywordsAuthoritarian election
COVID-19 lockdown
Hong Kong China
Opposition coercion
Public health
Selective opportunistic repression in disguise
Issue Date1-Dec-2024
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Social Science & Medicine, 2024, v. 362 How to Cite?
Abstract

Repression comes with costs, such as reducing regime legitimacy and citizen conformity. The COVID-19 pandemic was an opportunity and a pretext for authoritarian regimes to repress their populations at a low cost. This paper examines the case of Hong Kong, where restriction-testing declarations (RTDs) were used as a lockdown measure to facilitate mandatory testing for the virus from January 2021 to September 2022. Despite the government's claim that RTDs were implemented for public health reasons, statistical analyses showed that Hong Kong districts that opposed the regime or those with a mobilization legacy were more likely to be subject to RTDs, with the opposition district effect present only when COVID-19 infections were low. These RTDs highlight the authoritarian regime's tradeoff in using a nonpolitical measure to achieve its political aims and illustrates the enduring impact of past election and mobilization activities on the choice of selective repression sites in Hong Kong.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/357384
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.9
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.954
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYuen, Wing Han Vera-
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-23T08:55:00Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-23T08:55:00Z-
dc.date.issued2024-12-01-
dc.identifier.citationSocial Science & Medicine, 2024, v. 362-
dc.identifier.issn0277-9536-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/357384-
dc.description.abstract<p>Repression comes with costs, such as reducing regime legitimacy and citizen conformity. The COVID-19 pandemic was an opportunity and a pretext for authoritarian regimes to repress their populations at a low cost. This paper examines the case of Hong Kong, where restriction-testing declarations (RTDs) were used as a lockdown measure to facilitate mandatory testing for the virus from January 2021 to September 2022. Despite the government's claim that RTDs were implemented for public health reasons, statistical analyses showed that Hong Kong districts that opposed the regime or those with a mobilization legacy were more likely to be subject to RTDs, with the opposition district effect present only when COVID-19 infections were low. These RTDs highlight the authoritarian regime's tradeoff in using a nonpolitical measure to achieve its political aims and illustrates the enduring impact of past election and mobilization activities on the choice of selective repression sites in Hong Kong.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofSocial Science & Medicine-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectAuthoritarian election-
dc.subjectCOVID-19 lockdown-
dc.subjectHong Kong China-
dc.subjectOpposition coercion-
dc.subjectPublic health-
dc.subjectSelective opportunistic repression in disguise-
dc.titleFrom Public Health to Political Repression: COVID-19 Lockdown Measure in Hong Kong's Opposition Districts-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117440-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85207618587-
dc.identifier.volume362-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-5347-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001348385600001-
dc.identifier.issnl0277-9536-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats