File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The effects of flow settings during high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy for neonates and young children

TitleThe effects of flow settings during high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy for neonates and young children
Authors
Issue Date2024
Citation
European Respiratory Review, 2024, v. 33, n. 171, article no. 230223 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground During neonatal and paediatric high-flow nasal cannula therapy, optimising the flow setting is crucial for favourable physiological and clinical outcomes. However, considerable variability exists in clinical practice regarding initial flows and subsequent adjustments for these patients. Our review aimed to summarise the impact of various flows during high-flow nasal cannula treatment in neonates and children. Methods Two investigators independently searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane for in vitro and in vivo studies published in English before 30 April 2023. Studies enrolling adults (⩾18 years) or those using a single flow setting were excluded. Data extraction and risk of bias assessments were performed independently by two investigators. The study protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022345419). Results 38 406 studies were identified, with 44 included. In vitro studies explored flow settings’ effects on airway pressures, humidity and carbon dioxide clearance; all were flow-dependent. Observational clinical studies consistently reported that higher flows led to increased pharyngeal pressure and potentially increased intrathoracic airway pressure (especially among neonates), improved oxygenation, and reduced respiratory rate and work of breathing up to a certain threshold. Three randomised controlled trials found no significant differences in treatment failure among different flow settings. Flow impacts exhibited significant heterogeneity among different patients. Conclusion Individualising flow settings in neonates and young children requires consideration of the patient’s peak inspiratory flow, respiratory rate, heart rate, tolerance, work of breathing and lung aeration for optimal care.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/358080
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 9.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.893
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLi, Jie-
dc.contributor.authorDeng, Ni-
dc.contributor.authorHe, Wan Jia Aaron-
dc.contributor.authorYang, Cui-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Pan-
dc.contributor.authorAlbuainain, Fai A.-
dc.contributor.authorRing, Brian J.-
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Andrew G.-
dc.contributor.authorRotta, Alexandre T.-
dc.contributor.authorGuglielmo, Robert D.-
dc.contributor.authorMilési, Christophe-
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-23T03:00:59Z-
dc.date.available2025-07-23T03:00:59Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Respiratory Review, 2024, v. 33, n. 171, article no. 230223-
dc.identifier.issn0905-9180-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/358080-
dc.description.abstractBackground During neonatal and paediatric high-flow nasal cannula therapy, optimising the flow setting is crucial for favourable physiological and clinical outcomes. However, considerable variability exists in clinical practice regarding initial flows and subsequent adjustments for these patients. Our review aimed to summarise the impact of various flows during high-flow nasal cannula treatment in neonates and children. Methods Two investigators independently searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane for in vitro and in vivo studies published in English before 30 April 2023. Studies enrolling adults (⩾18 years) or those using a single flow setting were excluded. Data extraction and risk of bias assessments were performed independently by two investigators. The study protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022345419). Results 38 406 studies were identified, with 44 included. In vitro studies explored flow settings’ effects on airway pressures, humidity and carbon dioxide clearance; all were flow-dependent. Observational clinical studies consistently reported that higher flows led to increased pharyngeal pressure and potentially increased intrathoracic airway pressure (especially among neonates), improved oxygenation, and reduced respiratory rate and work of breathing up to a certain threshold. Three randomised controlled trials found no significant differences in treatment failure among different flow settings. Flow impacts exhibited significant heterogeneity among different patients. Conclusion Individualising flow settings in neonates and young children requires consideration of the patient’s peak inspiratory flow, respiratory rate, heart rate, tolerance, work of breathing and lung aeration for optimal care.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Respiratory Review-
dc.titleThe effects of flow settings during high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy for neonates and young children-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1183/16000617.0223-2023-
dc.identifier.pmid38537946-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85189261606-
dc.identifier.volume33-
dc.identifier.issue171-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 230223-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 230223-
dc.identifier.eissn1600-0617-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001195735500008-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats