File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A comparative analysis of microplastics in feces of terrestrial mammalian wildlife around Hong Kong

TitleA comparative analysis of microplastics in feces of terrestrial mammalian wildlife around Hong Kong
Authors
KeywordsFeeding behavior
Particle size
Plastic pollution
Wildlife
Issue Date2-Jul-2025
PublisherNature Portfolio
Citation
Scientific Reports, 2025, v. 15, n. 1 How to Cite?
Abstract

Plastic ingestion by terrestrial mammals, especially wildlife near urbanized areas, remains underexplored, with limited studies exploring species-specific differences. This study addresses these gaps by examining microplastics (MPs) in feces of five wild species from Hong Kong’s countryside: buffalo, cattle, wild boar, macaques, and porcupines. These species were selected for their high interaction with humans and consumption of anthropogenic food. Fecal samples were digested, visually inspected, and MPs characterized using spectroscopy. Microplastics were detected across all sites: macaques (0.2–6.9 MPs/gram dry weight [d.w.], 50–90% occurrence), boars (0.5–3.7 MPs/gram d.w., 60–100% occurrence), porcupines (2.1 MPs/gram d.w., 80% occurrence), buffalo (17.7 MPs/gram d.w., 100% occurrence), and cattle (4.1–65.5 MPs/gram d.w., 90–100% occurrence). Secondary microplastics, primarily polyethylene, polypropylene, and polyester (common in food packaging and textiles) were predominant. Feeding behaviour significantly influenced microplastic abundance. Non-selective grazers (buffalo and cattle) exhibited higher concentrations (median: 15.8 and 17.7 MPs/gram d.w., respectively) compared to selective feeders (macaques, porcupines, and boars; median: 1.8, 2.1, and 1.2 MPs/gram d.w.). Regarding MPs size, the larger mammals, cattle and buffalo, excreted significantly larger microplastics (522 and 391 µm) compared to macaques and porcupines (301 and 268 µm). We present the first evidence of plastic ingestion by common wildlife species from Hong Kong, emphasizing the vulnerability of animals to plastic pollution in peri-urban habitats. The findings underscore the need for research on the health impacts of plastic ingestion and the development of strategies to mitigate plastic pollution to natural ecosystems.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/358559

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSiña, Mariella-
dc.contributor.authorKunz, Alexander-
dc.contributor.authorNot, Christelle-
dc.contributor.authorLiou, Sofia Ya Hsuan-
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-07T00:33:02Z-
dc.date.available2025-08-07T00:33:02Z-
dc.date.issued2025-07-02-
dc.identifier.citationScientific Reports, 2025, v. 15, n. 1-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/358559-
dc.description.abstract<p>Plastic ingestion by terrestrial mammals, especially wildlife near urbanized areas, remains underexplored, with limited studies exploring species-specific differences. This study addresses these gaps by examining microplastics (MPs) in feces of five wild species from Hong Kong’s countryside: buffalo, cattle, wild boar, macaques, and porcupines. These species were selected for their high interaction with humans and consumption of anthropogenic food. Fecal samples were digested, visually inspected, and MPs characterized using spectroscopy. Microplastics were detected across all sites: macaques (0.2–6.9 MPs/gram dry weight [d.w.], 50–90% occurrence), boars (0.5–3.7 MPs/gram d.w., 60–100% occurrence), porcupines (2.1 MPs/gram d.w., 80% occurrence), buffalo (17.7 MPs/gram d.w., 100% occurrence), and cattle (4.1–65.5 MPs/gram d.w., 90–100% occurrence). Secondary microplastics, primarily polyethylene, polypropylene, and polyester (common in food packaging and textiles) were predominant. Feeding behaviour significantly influenced microplastic abundance. Non-selective grazers (buffalo and cattle) exhibited higher concentrations (median: 15.8 and 17.7 MPs/gram d.w., respectively) compared to selective feeders (macaques, porcupines, and boars; median: 1.8, 2.1, and 1.2 MPs/gram d.w.). Regarding MPs size, the larger mammals, cattle and buffalo, excreted significantly larger microplastics (522 and 391 µm) compared to macaques and porcupines (301 and 268 µm). We present the first evidence of plastic ingestion by common wildlife species from Hong Kong, emphasizing the vulnerability of animals to plastic pollution in peri-urban habitats. The findings underscore the need for research on the health impacts of plastic ingestion and the development of strategies to mitigate plastic pollution to natural ecosystems.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherNature Portfolio-
dc.relation.ispartofScientific Reports-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectFeeding behavior-
dc.subjectParticle size-
dc.subjectPlastic pollution-
dc.subjectWildlife-
dc.titleA comparative analysis of microplastics in feces of terrestrial mammalian wildlife around Hong Kong-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41598-025-07672-5-
dc.identifier.pmid40604137-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-105009978959-
dc.identifier.volume15-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.eissn2045-2322-
dc.identifier.issnl2045-2322-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats