File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Study of the effectiveness of different pelvic floor muscle training methods for improving urinary incontinence in patients with prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy

TitleStudy of the effectiveness of different pelvic floor muscle training methods for improving urinary incontinence in patients with prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy
Authors
Keywordsmagnetic stimulation
Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT)
prostate cancer (PCa)
radical prostatectomy (RP)
stress urinary incontinence (SUI)
Issue Date11-Jul-2025
PublisherTaylor and Francis Group
Citation
The Aging Male, 2025, v. 28, n. 1 How to Cite?
Abstract

Introduction: To compare the effects of different pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) modes on improving iatrogenic stress urinary incontinence (SUI) recovery in prostate cancer (PCa) patients after radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods: PCa patients who underwent RP were prospectively enrolled and randomized into standard PFMT (S-PFMT) group, somatosensory interactive PFMT (SI-PFMT, an enhanced PFMT) group, and standard PFMT combined with magnetic stimulation (S-PFMT+MS) group. SUI status was evaluated through the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) scores and 1-hour pad test. Results: 101 subjects were enrolled, including 48 in S-PFMT group, 39 in SI-PFMT group, and 14 in S-PFMT+MS group. All groups showed significant ICIQ-UI SF score improvement at 3 and 6 months post-RP compared with baseline (all p < 0.001). At 6 months post-RP, significant improvement of 1-hour pad test result was observed (p = 0.012). Compared with those in the other two groups, patients in the S-PFMT+MS group exhibited significantly better SUI improvement (p = 0.033 vs. S-PFMT; p = 0.011 vs. SI-PFMT) at 6 months. Bayesian survival analysis revealed the superior efficacy of the S-PFMT+MS intervention over an extended period. Conclusions: PCa patients may benefit from magnetic stimulation in addition to standard PFMT for post-RP SUI recovery. 


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/358773
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.7
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.744

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShi, Ruofan-
dc.contributor.authorMa, Zhiyang-
dc.contributor.authorTse, Yuen Bing-
dc.contributor.authorChun, Tsun Tsun Stacia-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Da-
dc.contributor.authorLuo, Fang-
dc.contributor.authorXu, Ping-
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Dan-
dc.contributor.authorNg, Sau Loi-
dc.contributor.authorXu, Ying-
dc.contributor.authorXu, Danfeng-
dc.contributor.authorNa, Rong-
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-13T07:47:56Z-
dc.date.available2025-08-13T07:47:56Z-
dc.date.issued2025-07-11-
dc.identifier.citationThe Aging Male, 2025, v. 28, n. 1-
dc.identifier.issn1368-5538-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/358773-
dc.description.abstract<p>Introduction<strong>:</strong> To compare the effects of different pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) modes on improving iatrogenic stress urinary incontinence (SUI) recovery in prostate cancer (PCa) patients after radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods<strong>:</strong> PCa patients who underwent RP were prospectively enrolled and randomized into standard PFMT (S-PFMT) group, somatosensory interactive PFMT (SI-PFMT, an enhanced PFMT) group, and standard PFMT combined with magnetic stimulation (S-PFMT+MS) group. SUI status was evaluated through the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) scores and 1-hour pad test. Results<strong>:</strong> 101 subjects were enrolled, including 48 in S-PFMT group, 39 in SI-PFMT group, and 14 in S-PFMT+MS group. All groups showed significant ICIQ-UI SF score improvement at 3 and 6 months post-RP compared with baseline (all <em>p</em> < 0.001). At 6 months post-RP, significant improvement of 1-hour pad test result was observed (<em>p</em> = 0.012). Compared with those in the other two groups, patients in the S-PFMT+MS group exhibited significantly better SUI improvement (<em>p</em> = 0.033 <em>vs</em>. S-PFMT; <em>p</em> = 0.011 <em>vs</em>. SI-PFMT) at 6 months. Bayesian survival analysis revealed the superior efficacy of the S-PFMT+MS intervention over an extended period. Conclusions: PCa patients may benefit from magnetic stimulation in addition to standard PFMT for post-RP SUI recovery. <br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Group-
dc.relation.ispartofThe Aging Male-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectmagnetic stimulation-
dc.subjectPelvic floor muscle training (PFMT)-
dc.subjectprostate cancer (PCa)-
dc.subjectradical prostatectomy (RP)-
dc.subjectstress urinary incontinence (SUI)-
dc.titleStudy of the effectiveness of different pelvic floor muscle training methods for improving urinary incontinence in patients with prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13685538.2025.2530469-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-105010342159-
dc.identifier.volume28-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.eissn1473-0790-
dc.identifier.issnl1368-5538-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats