BIOM-63. LONG-TERM SURVIVAL AND MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION OF IDH-WILDTYPE GLIOBLASTOMA IN AN ASIAN COHORT

Abstract

<p>BACKGROUND</p><p>Glioblastoma (GB), the most aggressive form of brain tumor, presents a significant clinical challenge with a devastating prognosis. Globally, the median overall survival (OS) for GB is typically 12-15 months, largely due to its inherent resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. However, some patients exhibit prolonged survival, and their specific demographic and genomic characteristics remain poorly defined. Understanding the clinical profile of these exceptional responders holds great promise for informing improved management strategies for GB.</p><p>METHODS</p><p>In a retrospective two-center study conducted in Hong Kong (IRB: UW 21-189), we recruited 80 patients diagnosed with IDH wildtype glioblastoma. All patients underwent next-generation sequencing as part of their treatment. Long-term survivor (LTS) was defined as >=36 months from diagnosis, while medium-term survivor (MTS) was defined as >=18 months, and <18 months as short-term survivors (STS). When appropriate, descriptive statistics were used to report frequency with percentage or median with range. Fisher’s exact test was employed to analyze categorical variables, while continuous variables were assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. All statistical analyses were conducted using R (version 4.2.3). Result: Among the cohort of 80 recruited patients, the median survival was 18.8 months (95% CI 17.2-24.8). Notably, 21% (n=17) were LTS, 31% (n=25) were MTS, and 48% (n=38) were STS. A statistically significant variation (p < 0.05) was evident across three groups: gender distribution, the number of resections performed, the proportion of patients receiving genomic-guided treatment, and their participation in clinical trials. However, no significant difference was observed in MGMT promoter status and ECOG score.</p><p>CONCLUSION</p><p>Identifying these clinical factors enhances the clinical management of GB. The implications of these findings underscore the potential importance of incorporating genomic-guided treatment in both local and global clinical practices in GB.</p>