File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1093/jogss/ogae039
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-86000130119
- Find via

Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Modes of Securitization and Desecuritization of Transnational Kinship Ties: Overseas Chinese in Southeast Asia amidst Rising Chinese Power
| Title | Modes of Securitization and Desecuritization of Transnational Kinship Ties: Overseas Chinese in Southeast Asia amidst Rising Chinese Power |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | China diaspora politics overseas Chinese securitization transnational kinship ties |
| Issue Date | 1-Mar-2025 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| Citation | Journal of Global Security Studies, 2025, v. 10, n. 1 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | This paper explores under what context the transnational ethnic kinship ties between the overseas Chinese in Southeast Asia and China have not led to their securitization and in what context they have. As the rising great power with exponential economic growth for the past few decades, China has transformed itself from a dirt-poor backwater state to the second largest economy in the world and is also seemingly on the way to reclaim the historical dominant status in East and Southeast Asia. During this process, overseas Chinese in various home states in Southeast Asia have not experienced a uniform securitization of their kinship ties. This paper investigates some of the dynamic patterns about overseas Chinese in Southeast Asia’s relationship between the changing kin state and their home states in the recent past. Focusing on how states in Southeast Asia maintain different types of relations with China in the context of the latter’s rising, this paper contends that the ways in which overseas Chinese communities in the region manage their political space and negotiate their belonging are a function of a combination of international structural changes and domestic political factors. Empirically, this paper compares three states of Southeast Asia—Thailand, Myanmar, and Indonesia—in the different ways of their treatment of the ethnic Chinese, as well as the responding strategies utilized by the ethnic Chinese in navigating their political space and belonging. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/358989 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.7 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.782 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Han, Enze | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-08-19T00:31:49Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-08-19T00:31:49Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-03-01 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Global Security Studies, 2025, v. 10, n. 1 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2057-3189 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/358989 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | <p>This paper explores under what context the transnational ethnic kinship ties between the overseas Chinese in Southeast Asia and China have not led to their securitization and in what context they have. As the rising great power with exponential economic growth for the past few decades, China has transformed itself from a dirt-poor backwater state to the second largest economy in the world and is also seemingly on the way to reclaim the historical dominant status in East and Southeast Asia. During this process, overseas Chinese in various home states in Southeast Asia have not experienced a uniform securitization of their kinship ties. This paper investigates some of the dynamic patterns about overseas Chinese in Southeast Asia’s relationship between the changing kin state and their home states in the recent past. Focusing on how states in Southeast Asia maintain different types of relations with China in the context of the latter’s rising, this paper contends that the ways in which overseas Chinese communities in the region manage their political space and negotiate their belonging are a function of a combination of international structural changes and domestic political factors. Empirically, this paper compares three states of Southeast Asia—Thailand, Myanmar, and Indonesia—in the different ways of their treatment of the ethnic Chinese, as well as the responding strategies utilized by the ethnic Chinese in navigating their political space and belonging.</p> | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Oxford University Press | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Global Security Studies | - |
| dc.subject | China | - |
| dc.subject | diaspora politics | - |
| dc.subject | overseas Chinese | - |
| dc.subject | securitization | - |
| dc.subject | transnational kinship ties | - |
| dc.title | Modes of Securitization and Desecuritization of Transnational Kinship Ties: Overseas Chinese in Southeast Asia amidst Rising Chinese Power | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/jogss/ogae039 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-86000130119 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 10 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2057-3170 | - |
| dc.identifier.issnl | 2057-3189 | - |
